Garcetti went on to say that the federal government is not living up to its obligation to fully fund the Section 8 housing program.
A fresh approach - not enough of someone else's loot.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Libloather
I’ve seen some nice residential areas of cities destroyed by Section 8 housing.
It is not a great term for Military people. It means “Unfit for Military service”.
Possibly why it is named Section 8 for housing.
To: Libloather
Sanctuary cities and states get nothing.
36 posted on
08/20/2019 6:27:00 AM PDT by
CPT Clay
(Q sent me)
To: Libloather
Let’s see, 60,00 Homeless junkies living on the Street crapping everywhere just in Los Angeles.
1.2 MILLION Foreign Nationals with NO Legal Right to be here, ALL Collecting some sort of Government Welfare. Just in Los Angeles
Anyone that give these crooks in California Government a nickel should be Deported to Venezuela.
37 posted on
08/20/2019 6:47:28 AM PDT by
eyeamok
To: Libloather
That’s LA’s problem not ours.
38 posted on
08/20/2019 6:51:38 AM PDT by
bgill
To: Libloather
California voters keep voting democrat let them live with what they caused.
39 posted on
08/20/2019 10:09:35 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: Libloather
Expand Section 8 Housing in Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Santa Monica and Holmby Hills to start.
To: Libloather
Homelessness is the result of liberal land use planning. Why aren’t Republicans pointing this out?
41 posted on
08/20/2019 10:56:34 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: Libloather
Now just a minute. Isn't this the state of the
$21.4 Billion budget surplus? What do they need money from the rest of the U.S. taxpayers for?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson