Posted on 08/15/2019 5:02:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
Funny. Russia grabbed eastern Poland and Germany western Poland. But only Germany was declared war against.
Did not some in the West also look to the Nazis to keep the Reds in check?
For some time I have been warning that a strategic threat to America involves a China/Russia/German axis that would combine the petroleum and minerals of the world's greatest landmass with the population and economy of China and the technology of Germany. Such a combination, while unlikely, becomes more threatening every day.
Just yesterday my next-door neighbor here in Germany observed that the future of Germany lies not with America but with Russia.
It appears that Stalin came to believe that he was better served by joining with Germany than by making an alliance with the Western democracies against Nazi Germany because the Western democracy had convinced him by their repeated appeasement of Germany that they simply would not fight.
As to the question why did we (meaning at that time Great Britain and the Empire) not declare war on Russia for invading Poland, one has to be observant of realities on the ground. The idea that England could take on both of these superpowers ( between them Germany and Russia would kill approximately 35 million of each other's people in a war in which Britain and America each lost less than 500,000 dead), is simply not credible. That is why Churchill uttered his famous quip in support of his making an alliance with Russia against Nazi Germany, "If Hitler invaded Hell I would at least make a friendly reference to the devil in the House of Commons."
Many of us on these threads think it is "cool" to break up NATO. Nothing could be further from the interests of the United States whose real interests lie in reforming NATO just as our real interests lie in reforming the EU. We need Europe as a counterweight to an axis which is already forming between Russia and China.
Was before my time, of course, but seems to me the platforms of the Socialists and the Communists were similar enough in the various European countries that they were vying for the same blocks of voters. Same thing in Germany. The Socialists promoted a hatred of the Communists to get more voters and control of the governments. Once that was accomplished, friendly pacts were made with the USSR.
Like a wise man once said: National Socialism vs. International Socialism.
Two sides of the same coin.
They should have been left alone and literally wiped each other off the face of the Earth. Think how much better everything would be today.
Russia has broken every treaty they ever signed except this one; Germany broke it first.
“The incompatibility between communism and Nazism was considered by all to be existential and permanent.”
Same system, same red flags, different crew and national quirks at the top.
Bump!
Read Peter Zeihan. He thinks Russia will be a problem, but that due to mutual energy needs, Russia and Germany cannot possibly ally.
Germany will also be a problem. Their nearest source of oil is over 1,000 miles away.
Both have hugely declining populations. Neither has east-west navigable rivers. Germany is heavily dependent (as it was in WW II) on a low-wage/slave labor work force.
Of the two, Germany is the most dangerous as it will be the most desperate.
BTW, by 2030, the US will be, on average, 3 years younger than China. “Demographics is destiny.”
We see it all the time with crime families cooperating in the short term while positioning themselves for the next street war. Hitler only got Western Poland. Stalin got Eastern Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and German recognition of Iran being in the Soviet sphere of influence.
USSR was at war with Germany in Spain in earlier 1930s before anyone else. Before 1939 Molotov toured all around Europe to assemble an alliance against Hitler UK and France in the first place. We know how it worked. ‘Peace in our time’ as Chamberlain puts it.
The Western Europeans hoped Hitler would be busy bleeding dry in the East before them but the pact ruined their expectations and for that reason described as a sort of evil alliance.
The pact in reality was not like a military alliance more like a truce in a Cold War and an assurance the war won’t get hot.
It was a sort of checkmate for France and UK, that is why they hate it.
A number of small nations were victims true but it is how it worked before UN. Poland among other things had similar pact with Germany to dismember Czechoslovakia before it fell to the Soviet-German pact.
“” “” It appears that Stalin came to believe that he was better served by joining with Germany than by making an alliance with the Western democracies against Nazi Germany because the Western democracy had convinced him by their repeated appeasement of Germany that they simply would not fight.”” “”
Please, read Kissinger’s ‘Diplomacy’ if you don’t trust Russian sources on the subject. The real situation was very different. The alliance with Germany was never on table since Stalin took side in a Spanish War. Also Hitler’s ideas on Lebenstraum and overall attitude toward the Slavic ‘race’ weren’t particularly a big secret. The inevitability of war with Germany was clear for everyone with half a brain in Russia in a year after Hitler took over Germany.
https://www.britannica.com/event/German-Soviet-Nonaggression-Pact
You are on the right track.
As I said earlier Britannica is a biased source on the subject because the truth puts UK in a bad light.
What ‘personal preference’ they are talking about? Details are needed to support this claim. There was no alternative deal with UK and France for Russia. Molotov flew to London and Paris before the idea of the German pact ever floated. He got nothing. It is all well documented. Kissinger actually describes Chamberlain as a bumbling morron.
Wrongly so. They had much more in common than differences. Different modes of totalitarianism. So why did Hitler attack and invade the USSR? Because he was insane.
When I first came here an elderly lady, my next-door neighbor, gave me a book styled,Inn herrlich strömender, grünblauer Fluß which describes the trade running near my house through Bavaria and on to the black sea dating to the middle ages. Interestingly, the crews on the barges that handled the horses and the towing were required by law to get many liters of beer a day.
Rivers today are not of much relative economic importance but they historically account for the fact that most of the village churches in my area have Bell shaped steeples. And they account for the fact that Hitler, the son of a minor custom official, was born on a little town along the river where a custom station was established, as described in the book above.
As to declining populations, I entertain a very minority view, at least in the longer-term, I believe that those countries, especially Japan, which refrains from importing uneducated and dependent workers to compensate for an aging population will prosper because they turn to robots. I think Germany's problem will be the demographic wave which now appears to be inexorable that show a Muslim takeover in my children's lifetime. If that occurs, Germany will have more on his plate than its energy policy.
Perhaps the irony is that a Muslim population will bring Germany to its senses-at least about its obsessive environmentalism. Electric bills here are the highest in Europe after they shut down domestic atomic energy sources of electricity. We still get much energy from atomic energy, but that comes from France where the prevailing winds will no doubt bring us the results of any catastrophe.
Germany has always looked to the Eastern states as substitute colonies that Germany could not acquire because it came into the nationstate business under Bismarck too late for colonies of consequence so it turned to the east for markets and exploits the European Union in that fashion even today. Incidentally, German GDP consists of more than 40 % exports!
Thus, when my neighbor speaks of needing Russia more than America, he is thinking traditionally about markets for Germany's exports. Better he should look into those churches under those bell steeples for relief from the demographic wave about to crest over Germany.
,
Two sides of the same coin.
The Germans don’t have to win, but the Russians must lose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.