Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

” ‘More generally, “let the experts design it” or “give it to the experts and let them see what can be done with it” has historically resulted in disaster.’ “ [my post 84]

“based on what?” [Steve Van Doorn, post 84]

So your memory failed before you hit the end of my paragraph?

I’m minded to recall that portion of Gulliver’s Travels where Lemuel encountered the immortals, who weren’t immune to mental aging, thus were unable to read more than a sentence without forgetting what they were doing in the first place. I forget what Jonathon Swift named that strange people.

For those dying to know, it’s based on the efforts & experiences of the US military establishment during the development of the air weapon, chiefly during the First World War. Unless and until you learn what Irving Brinton Holley Jr contributed to the development and explication of doctrine, you will never progress beyond a kindergarten level of understanding here.

By way of encouragement, _Ideas & Weapons isn’t a terribly thick book. Don’t be scared.


85 posted on 08/26/2019 3:39:14 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: schurmann

This seems like a circular argument. If there is no general guide line to make a weapon then no weapon can be made.


87 posted on 08/26/2019 3:57:52 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson