Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Submarine Commander Sues Navy to Release USS Thresher Investigation
USNI News ^ | August 11, 2019 7:40 PM | Ben Werner

Posted on 08/12/2019 6:25:00 AM PDT by robowombat

Retired Submarine Commander Sues Navy to Release USS Thresher Investigation

By: Ben Werner August 9, 2019 8:57 AM • Updated: August 11, 2019 7:40 PM

A retired nuclear submarine commander filed suit against the Navy to gain access to records classified for more than a half-century after the sinking of USS Thresher (SSN-593) – the Navy’s worst nuclear submarine disaster.

Capt. James Bryant, who served on three Thresher-class subs, including a tour as commanding officer of USS Guardfish (SSN-612), has in his retirement taken to investigating the cause of Thresher’s sinking.

“I’m trying to find out what happened because it’s good lessons learned,” Bryant told USNI News. “You need to have scholars look at this. What are we really protecting? I’m not doing this to embarrass the Navy.”

When Thresher sank to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean 56 years ago, 129 officers, sailors and shipbuilders died. Thresher was supposed to be the most advanced submarine, and its failure during the height of the Cold War was considered a tremendous disaster, Bryant said.

In the aftermath of Thresher, the Navy created its SubSafe program. Bryant says if the facts were released, the incident could serve as a valuable learning tool.

“A lot of things had to have gone wrong for that submarine to sink,” Bryant said.

A year ago, Bryant wrote in Proceedings why he thinks the Navy should declassify the Thresher investigation. On April 8, 2019, Bryant filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Navy asking for the release of Thresher investigation documents.

Displeased with the slow-pace of the Navy’s response, Bryant filed a lawsuit on July 5 alleging the “Navy has improperly withheld agency records from Plaintiff.”

In response, the Navy denies withholding any records under the Freedom of Information Act, according to an Aug. 8 court filing. A court date for the case has not been set.

Theories about why Thresher sank have circulated since it sent its last garbled report during a deep dive test on April 10, 1963. Some theories revolve any number of possible mechanical failures or design flaws. Others hold to more far-fetched Soviet Navy interference. The official reason involves a ruptured pipe causing flooding that shorted-out electrical panels, resulting in a loss of propulsion at test depth.

Bryant, who spent a significant part of his naval career serving aboard Thresher-class submarines, suspects a problem with Thresher’s main coolant pumps led to the sinking. However, without the Navy records requested in his Freedom of Information Act request, Bryant said there’s no way to determine if any of the theories are correct.

Given the age of the investigation and a 2012 memo from the Navy’s director of undersea warfare, Bryant says the bulk of the Thresher investigation should be releasable.

The Navy’s director of undersea warfare stated in the 2012 memo, “Approximately 75 percent of the records have been declassified and are available for public release through FOIA. The remaining records are classified and are subject to redaction through a mandatory declassification review process before being released.”

However, seven years after the memo, and 56 years since the sinking, Bryant says the Navy has released just 19 pages of more than 1,700 pages of testimony. Bryant is suing to get the Navy to release all declassified Thresher information.

“All they have to do is remove temperatures and pressures and flow rates,” Bryant told USNI News. “We’re not after reactor design, and I doubt very much the court of inquiry went too much into reactor design.”

Bryant also thinks there’s a great untold story of how the nuclear Navy survived the sinking. Adm. Hyman Rickover, during his testimony, successfully made a case to continue building nuclear submarines amid advocacy to back away from the new technology involved in the disaster.

“Naval Reactors has a great story to tell here because Rickover beats these people, he saved a very important program,” Bryant said. “The diesel boat guys wanted to go back to diesel boats, and the Cold War would have had a different history.”


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: teeman8r

Tommy Cox and Bobby Reed wrote Kursk.


41 posted on 08/12/2019 7:35:00 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

That’s about as funny as...


42 posted on 08/12/2019 7:41:52 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

My understanding of the the Thresher tragedy is this. A reactor scram caused a loss of propulsion. An emergency blow was initiated but was unsuccessful because ice formed in the lines leading to the main ballast tanks due to the cooling effect of the rapid expansion of compressed air.

This is what I learned when I attended submarine school in 1971. I went on to serve on a diesel boat not a nuke. If it was a problem that was with the reactor coolant system then its quite possible that the information is still considered classified today.


43 posted on 08/12/2019 7:42:55 AM PDT by SubVet72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
“A lot of things had to have gone wrong for that submarine to sink,” Bryant said.

Was this the sub that sank about a year after a Russian sub was accidentally sunk?

44 posted on 08/12/2019 7:43:41 AM PDT by GOPJ (Liberals virtue signal by showing how much crap they can overlook in the black community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
Those boats were built in a New England shipyard (Grotten, CT??). At the time of construction the welders were paid on a piecemeal basis to speed up construction. In other words, paid by the inch of welding rather than by an hourly rate.

Electric Boat, a division of General Dynamics.

45 posted on 08/12/2019 7:45:08 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie; MCF; All

It will never be known exactly what happened. The debris field is Huge and Deep. Don’t think there are big pieces except maybe the Reactor ? Anybody know anything about that ?


46 posted on 08/12/2019 7:48:55 AM PDT by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bricklayer

My Condolences to Your Family.

RIP Sir.


47 posted on 08/12/2019 7:50:48 AM PDT by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1
My understanding of what happened in brief was they were attempting an Emergency Blow and the Valving for the air froze over blocking the air from getting to the Ballast Tanks to displace the water in the Tanks.

This is exactly what I have been told from another source who was in the Navy's submarine program.

This explanation is apparently taught in the Navy's submarine training classes. All subsequent submarines have drain valves for their blow valves to prevent such an event from occurring again.

48 posted on 08/12/2019 8:08:18 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
I have been informed regarding what is believed to have happened to the Scorpion, and I fully understand why nobody will talk about it.

Big can of worms right there.

49 posted on 08/12/2019 8:10:44 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MichaelRDanger

My Dad was stationed on the Thresher but decided submarine life was not for him. He went to make the Navy a career, but never forgot the crew of the Thresher. He kept several momentos which I inherited from him. I was born afterwards.


50 posted on 08/12/2019 8:45:16 AM PDT by TheDon (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head
What is remarkable is that this massive cover-up has been successful. Many, many people must know these facts.

A classic pattern in conspiracy theories. Hundreds had to know, no one says a thing.

51 posted on 08/12/2019 9:13:39 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: mabarker1

That’s how the fish are powering their city.


54 posted on 08/12/2019 9:52:53 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
"A classic pattern in conspiracy theories. Hundreds had to know, no one says a thing."

I said it. Who is listening and ready to follow up?

55 posted on 08/12/2019 9:58:33 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
I was stationed on the USS Jallao (SS-368) in New London when the Thresher went down.

A dark day.

56 posted on 08/12/2019 10:20:52 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots; All

While rutting around the .net I found this:

https://interestingengineering.com/uss-thresher-and-scorpion-the-uss-lost-nuclear-submarines

I’ve tried several times to copy and paste but it’s blocked so use the LINK above to read some info like Yes there were Nuke Weapons onboard as well as being Nuke Powered.

Also a bit more Detailed Cause of Loss on both Boats.

Again, I send My Condolences out to All Family Members for Their Losses of Loved Ones.

And I Pray for Safety of Our Military, All Branches around the World as They put Their Lives on the line 24/7/365 so We Civilians can putter around on our daily business.


57 posted on 08/12/2019 11:28:14 AM PDT by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

A nuke boat on sea trials.


58 posted on 08/12/2019 11:28:58 AM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

“The first rule of the Silent Service is you do not talk about the loss of Scorpion. The second rule of the Silent Service is you do not talk about the loss of Scorpion.”

I was in Air Force Intelligence during Vietnam (back in those days it was called USAFSS). We had some Navy Intelligence people stationed with us. They said that Scorpion was sunk by the Soviets, in a kind of tit-for-tat for our sinking a Soviet sub in the Pacific. That is why it was so hushed up.


59 posted on 08/12/2019 1:01:13 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp; Pollster1; momincombatboots; Chode; All
Final Secret of the USS Scorpion.
60 posted on 08/12/2019 2:07:32 PM PDT by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson