Right to bear arms is taking precedence over right to live (hurl alert)

Press Reader ^ | 6th August 2019 | Editorial

[ridesthemiles]

MY right to protect myself & my property takes precedence over the ‘right to live’ by someone who chooses to INTRUDE upon my gated & posted property.

[YogicCowboy]

Privilege to murder preborn children long ago took precedence over the right to live.

[The Toll]

Democrats are just a clump of cells.

[libertylover]

The mass shootings are awful, but the alternative is far, far worse.

Then 2nd Amendment protects the entire “free world”. Without it, a totalitarian government would quickly take hold here and thus everywhere else as well with no one left to help to free us.

[aposiopetic]

Yes, you are right.

But the Left says (and, 46 years ago, a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court said) that the mother's supposed right to privacy takes precedence over the baby's right to live.

What utter nonsense.

[NativeSon]

What a douche-nozzle.

[IncPen]

I think the Frist Amendment has run its course when papers like the Press Reader begin to talk about depriving citizens of their Constitutional rights.

[Ennis85]

It actually from the Irish Independent, one of many newspapers featured on the site Pressreader. The reason why I’m sourcing it from pressreader is because Freerepublic won’t seem to allow that particular paper on here.

[TMN78247]

One wonders if the NAMELESS author of this editorial is STUPID enough to actually believe this INSANE FOOLISHNESS and/or that he/she is intelligent enough to KNOW that the opinions therein are simply FALSE.

Yours, TMN78247

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Actually its not. Mass shootings occur because our 2nd amendment rights are being violated arbitrarily. None of these victims had guns with them because they obeyed the law in what are really illegal gun-free zones.

Gun-free zones must have armed security personnel there to protect people. Gun-free zones in America are protected by no one. Any leftist can walk in with a gun and kill anyone they want.