“The suit from Peter Strzok also alleges he was unfairly punished for expressing his political opinions, and that the Justice Department violated his privacy when it shared hundreds of his text messages with reporters.”
One, his texts were ON DUTY on his Government phone.
Two, he clearly was violating the Hatch act by campaigning on duty.
Three, he was involved in a coup attempt complete with illegal wiretaps, and foreign collusion.
Four, He was violating a raft of sexual harassment policies and probably his security clearance with his office whore.
Exactly; had it been a private phone or server he could do that; it is govt equipment - which also nullifies his charge of a violation of privacy ... govt communications on govt-provided equipment are public. He must have a go-getter lawyer.
Well, that is my un-legal view at any rate. :^)