Barr is right....You don’t want to start with a weaker, less egregious case. After all the “classification” was made post Comey leaking and there are mitigating factors involved which would make this conviction a bit iffy (should be no problem with starting a soft coup).
Sorry but this is a load of BS. Why do you ask? The FISA abuse is years old. If they can’t make a case in the six months Barr has been on the job, when will they? What is there to even question? You don’t need an OIG report to charge anyone, that’s silly.
Barr received dozens of criminal referrals from congress almost on the day he was appointed. NOT ONE person paid the price or was charged. A lot of the referral were provable on day one. Lying to Congress under oath and obstruction of a congressional inquiry among the few.
Indicting someone prior to the report being issued would be other than just plain silly, political suicide.
What possible advantage could there be to indict a few weeks earlier than when the report is issued??
Sorry, but that would be just plain stupid.