Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

It doesn’t make sense to prosecute him for leaking a document that was not “classified” at the time he leaked it. The DOJ classified afterwards.

So, if they wanted to prosecute it would look as though they created an x-post-facto classification simply to prosecute him. That is kangaroo court crap—and any judge with any sense would toss it out on its behind.

There will be plenty to “get him” on in the coming months. I think its best not to start out with a loser of a case.


4 posted on 08/02/2019 1:24:20 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

There will be plenty to “get him” on in the coming months. I think its best not to start out with a loser of a case.

I agree. But it’s frustrating since the events of “the coming months” ALWAYS seem to be “coming” and never, ever arrive.

How long are we going to have to wait to see these seditionists brought to justice? Until nature has rendered the matter irrelevant since they’ve all assumed room temperature on their own?


8 posted on 08/02/2019 1:33:05 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt
The point here is to point out Comey’s behavior, which goes directly to character, to highlight the manufacturing of the coup and to document the extent of the FBI collusion in ongoing attempts to coverup official malfeasance at top levelsof FBI and DOJ and to obstruct investigation into that malfeasance.

Prosecution can wait in more serious crimes by Comey. This first disclosure, while it is a prose table crime , is just one small crime in a series of much more serious crimes so the the leaking is more appropriately evidence documenting Comeys much more serious crimes. This case is so convoluted and complex, trying to prosecute on this would confuse the issue of exactly which crimes Comey committed and would be detrimental to the process of bringing the guilty to justice< p>

11 posted on 08/02/2019 1:44:30 PM PDT by rdcbn ( Referential p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

“It doesn’t make sense to prosecute him for leaking a document that was not “classified” at the time he leaked it”

Precisely.

This would have been and iffy prosecution and there are far more egregious indictments on the horizon.....Perpetrating a fraud on the FISA court topping the list.

DiGenova gets ahead of his ski’s sometimes but he basically knows the Federal prosecution game and his judgment along with his wife’s is generally spot on,


14 posted on 08/02/2019 1:49:54 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

I agree with your assessment.


19 posted on 08/02/2019 1:53:37 PM PDT by MagnoliaB ( You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you will find you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

Yep, I agree. Gotta be patient. The Swamp would’ve loved for Barr to open on a technicality against Comey. It instantly would have soured public opinion.

This was a landmine avoided IMO.


66 posted on 08/02/2019 9:23:15 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson