Comparing what JAGs do in the course of their duties to Nuremberg is bullshit. These guys don’t chose their clients, and they can only prosecute with the information they have. It’s why we have trials.
Withholding exculpatory evidence and denying discovery evidence to the defense isn’t within the scope of their duties.
Equivocation dismissed.
The Nuremberg allusion stands as appropriate.
Your considered opinion notwithstanding. It’s exactly the same thing but to a vastly reduced degree. They knowingly violated his rights. They could have stopped violating his rights. They chose not to.