If Mueller Wasn’t in Charge, Who Was? A rundown of the possibilities and why they matter

American Thinker ^ | 07/29/2019 | Brian Joondeph

[Alas Babylon!]

Was he? What about the Clintons? The Obamas? The Clinton and Obama Protection Corps (big media)?

[Alas Babylon!]

All I’d ask then, if it is possible, post the ENTIRE article here on Free Republic. It’s not just about blog pimps.

Some sites really kill a browser experience with popups, ads and other embedded crap.

The best* thing about Free Republic; very simple, absolutely no ads.
.
.
.
.
.
*Seriously, this is one of MANY best things...

[Boogieman]

There is no rule that the excerpt has to start at the beginning of the article. If it’s one of these rambling introductions, the poster might want to excerpt a few paragraphs in the middle instead.

[Alas Babylon!]

That’s true unless they check the “This is an excerpt” box; then it just grabs the first 300 words or so, I believe.

[SisterK]

He’s not a blithering idiot. He knew damn good and well who they were and what they were about - it’s impossible to come up with a group of people that biased under random selection from within the DoJ.

Yep.

for his thirty pieces of silver

[arthurus]

Was Rosenstein a bad actor in all of this or did he play his role in Trump’s grander plan to drain the swamp and weed out the deep state conspirators?

I suspect Rosy filled both roles though the second unwittingly.

[bgill]

We all know Weissman.

But who said Mueller wasn’t in charge? If he was this out of it, CNN would have been wringing their hands and crying to the heavens about whatever should we do. If he were the doddering old confused fool he portrayed himself to be, the D’s would have pounced on it months ago in order to drag this fiasco on longer by appointing someone new who had to have an extra six months to get up to speed.