Why don’t you briefly summarize what you think proves it.
There are lots of scientists who don’t accept it, including a chemist who was nominated for the Nobel prize in chemistry.
You haven’t said one scientific thing. Saying it’s “accepted” (whatever that means exactly) or “proven” (besides being false) is not “talking science”.
Evolution theory doesn’t even qualify as true science since there’s no stated condition which would falsify it. That would be a minimal requirement to qualify as proven (or science).
A negative cannot be proven. Stop making a fool of yourself and demanding such a thing.
“Evolution theory doesn’t even qualify as true science since there’s no stated condition which would falsify it. “
Who brainwashed you with that lie?