Posted on 07/26/2019 6:52:53 PM PDT by Magnatron
A federal judge in Kentucky Friday threw out a defamation lawsuit filed against The Washington Post by Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann and his family over the paper's reporting of an incident between the young man and a Native American man this past January in Washington.
The lawsuit, which was filed in February, sought $250 million in damages and accused the Post of practicing "a modern-day form of McCarthyism" by targeting Sandmann and "using its vast financial resources to enter the bully pulpit by publishing a series of false and defamatory print and online articles ... to smear a young boy who was in its view an acceptable casualty in their war against the president."
Sandmann became the focus of outrage after a video of him standing face-to-face with a Native American man, Nathan Phillips, while wearing a red "Make America Great Again" hat surfaced and rapidly spread online. Sandmann was one of a group of Covington students attending the anti-abortion March for Life in Washington, D.C., while Phillips was attending the Indigenous Peoples' March on the same day.
In a 36-page ruling, U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman noted that the Post never mentioned Sandmann by name in its initial coverage of the incident, referring only to groups of "hat wearing teens." Bertelsman added that "the words used contain no reflection upon any particular individual" and thus could not be constituted as defamation. The judge also ruled that the newspaper used language that was "loose, figurative," and "rhetorical hyperbole" which is protected by the First Amendment.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Ha haaaaa! Rhetorical hyperbole (is there any other kind?)! Libspeak for Fake News.
Appeal! Appeal! Appeal!
Obola appointee...Obola rag.
Figures.
And how often does “The Right” get to have SEALED documents UN-SEALED because “anything could be in there”?
Ditto.
Cleary I was wrong and their IS a hierarchy to first amendment. At least in the eyes of the establishment.
My guess is IF this was a conservative blogger who misrepresented some liberal idiot, the judge would have been OK to have the lawsuit pursued; but for some reason the mainstream media is held in higher regards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.