Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: junta
Now with the new 777 that supposedly takes awhile to emplace and displace that seems almost reckless in regards to near peer combat.

You and I (I'm guessing) had the M198. I have to say I had old man skepticism towards the M777 when I first heard about it. But I've got to see it up close a few times, and it's a beautiful gun. The weight reduction is incredible, and it was kind of funny seeing that curved ramming staff.

I haven't heard about it being more difficult to emplace and displace, but it seems the much lighter weight should make it easier to manhandle on awkward ground, etc...

I do miss fire direction -- loved that job, and the sharp Marines that were in the 0844/0848 MOS's.

83 posted on 07/18/2019 8:32:00 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

IMO which is far short of .02 cents worth is that the 198 was a Marine Corps mistake, its prime mover could barely move it around 29 Palms when I was in, maybe they fixed that problem. And the 53E could barely lift it at sea level never mind Af/Pak. FTR SNAFU blogspot has a pic of 777 underneath a Chinook with what looks like ammo pallets slung next to it, sea level but still impressive for weight reduction compared to the 198.


106 posted on 07/19/2019 4:40:32 AM PDT by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson