My reading comprehension is impeccable.
I don’t like “the squad” or anything they stand for but will defend their rights to be idiots and say idiotic things.
His “clarifications” do not in any way diminish what was originally stated:
“So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly.....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how.....it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!”
Speaking about ones grievances with the government and public servants that serve at the will of the people is a fundamental right enshrined in the constitution.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Try again
Nobody is taking away their rights to be idiots. We're merely pointing out the obvious. It's the nature of public discourse that people will disagree with you.
Besides, if I read your comment correctly...Speaking about ones grievances with the government and public servants that serve at the will of the people is a fundamental right enshrined in the constitution...
...it applies to them as well, as each holds elective office.
The objections you've listed don't hold water, so you obviously have something else on your mind. What is it?