Posted on 07/14/2019 9:59:04 AM PDT by norcal joe
The Tuolumne County Sheriff's Office is investigating the shooting death of a Watsonville man who broke into a couple's tent Thursday morning.
The shooting happened in the Stanislaus National Forest at Deadman Campground.
Police say the 36-year-old Watsonville man entered an unassociated couple's tent around 2 a.m. and the woman woke up to the Watsonville man on top of her. The woman yelled to wake her boyfriend up,and the Watsonville man was shot after a confrontation.
No arrests have been made.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
As I understand it,
In You’re Residence,
Motel Room,Tent or RV
The legal resident is
Within his Right
To have a loaded
Weapon for His Protection.
Except where Prohibited.
From a book entitled;
How to own a gun and
Stay out of Jail.
Deadman Campground. The irony and the jokes just keep burbling up to the surface.
National Park vs. National Forest vs. BLM....very different rules. (for firearms. land use, etc.).
Love that screenshot. Thanks.
I think the national parks go by the state where they are located. I checked a few years ago and CC at Rocky Mountain National Park was ok if you had a permit valid for Colorado.
but in this is on federal property, and in CA don’t you need some kind of permit or something?
I’m going to say
You would need to
Contact appropriate
Park Ranger.
but don’t you need a permit to carry a gun in CA
The way it is spelled out
Is to “Have” a gun in Your
Residence,on your property.
Once you leave this Space
You could be in violation.
I am not a cop or a lawyer.
I invested 15 bucks for a
Book which points out many
Issues.
You have a specific Problem?
Um, as I said in response to your erroneous assertion that: “handgun + federal property = trouble...” - it’s no longer universally true.
The fact that it’s true in Commiefornia doesn’t make it true everywhere - just as I noted, it’s not UNIVERSALLY TRUE.
Even your own second post reinforces the inaccuracy of your first post, as there are numerous exceptions!
But, I’m glad you finally got around to correcting yourself.
not at all... i just don’t know CA gun laws other than they are not your friends 8^)
pls cut and paste said inaccuracy here
Um, as I said in response to your erroneous assertion that: “handgun + federal property = trouble...” - it’s no longer universally true.
The fact that it’s true in Commiefornia doesn’t make it true everywhere - just as I noted, it’s not UNIVERSALLY TRUE.
Even your own second post reinforces the inaccuracy of your first post, as there are numerous exceptions!
But, I’m glad you finally got around to correcting yourself.
California laws,,,
Absolutely Nutz!
What an interesting take on the story...
i just hope they don’t jam him up over this...
Same here...won’t let it chap my nether region until I hear it’s happening though...seems like we’re hearing a fewer number of the good guys being slammed for defending themselves lately....doesn’t give good optics to the Grabbers’ arguments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.