Picture Jerry Seinfeld with a quizzical look on his face and his hands out in front of him, palms out, “what is up with ALL THAT??”
You just got yourself into a lather with each new wrong assumption about me, or at least a non sequitur assumption. Gee to the whiz.
My almost silly use of the word “legal” regarding sexuality was just to prevent a FReeper coming at me with “well you must just love pedophilia or bestiality” BS because I accept homosexuality.
I do not need to twist myself into knots to understand that some people are attracted to their own gender. Or that some men have two girlfriends. Or that some people do not like sex. Or whatever. It’s all their business and doesn’t affect me.
You have a more strict, larger list of perversions than I do. That is ok. I see the Constitution as not dealing with what it doesn’t enumerate, so the fact that it didn’t deal in detailed sexual peccadilloes is not a great argument point for you.
I abhor the agendas to children: childhood should be unsexualized.
I abhor interference of religious people to safely practice their religions. No one should be forced to bake for ceremonies they don’t approve of, or sell abortifacient pills. There are some grey areas, like renting in a rental building, where the owner might have to obey fairness laws, or get out of the rental business. A gay couple has more of a right to find a home than they do to have a specific baked cake celebrating their union (since plenty of other bakers would happily make it).
I said I would die for this country (hopefully not while my kids still need me) because I believe in it. I didn’t say I’d die for illegal aliens or any of the other out of breath panic scenarios you concocted for me.
Calm down.
Back to the subject at hand. May I assume every loudmouth here keeps up a monthly pledge? If not you disgrace yourself. Pay for the right to assault me with your cri de cours. I do.
LMAO! Ok then. RME