The right case must ask the right question. In the 21st Century when women have had the vote for 100 years, women are Governors, Senators, Generals, Supreme Court Justices, it would be foolish and suicidal to assert that a natural born citizen must be a child of a citizen father. Similarly with 50% of births occuring to single mothers, demanding that a natural born citizen must have two citizen parents is never going to succeed.
Under any criteria that might pass muster with the Supreme Court, Barack Obama would have to qualify: born in the United States to an American citizen mother. Forget Kenya, one of the many lies told by Obama. Also forget his criminal acts to conceal whatever he did with his birth certificate to get into college. Same goes for Gabbard, born in an American territory to a ctizen mother.
As of right now, Harris would qualify IAW the 14th Amendment, but a separate challenge to Anchor babies might close the door on this one.
But the chances of 4 SCOTUS Justices agree to hear any challenge to the Natural Born Citizen clause is less likely than Ruth Bader Ginsburg being selected to be an astronaut for the first Mars mission.
“The right case must ask the right question.”
If that case is as you posit, and the consensus on the issue so universal, then it would seem a relatively straightforward proposition to address via the Fifth Amendment amendatory process.
But this discussion serves to substantiate the reality of the corruption that has been done with regard to the maintenence of constitutional integrity. This surrender to expediency served to impose upon us Dred Scott, Plessy vs Fergueson, Roe vs, Wade, Lawrence vs. Texas, Obergefell vs Hodges, Robert’s abject groveling on Obama Care, and a host of other constitutionally suspect rulings.
I think that an honest consideration of all this inconstancy promotes greater urgency to reversing this impetus, not less.
Our great constitution deserves no less.