To: Kaslin
Justice Kagan, writing for the Court, said in essence, not so fast. While deference may be appropriate in some cases, its not appropriate in all. From now on, the justices held, the courts must examine all the facts and circumstances before deciding to defer to an agencys judgment over what its regulations mean. While this wasnt a complete takedown of deference, it should prove to be a pretty effective body slam. Or, as one justice put it, deference has been zombified. Here's the beautiful thing in Kagan's language: whether or not she knows it, she just made a clear and cogent case against Stare Decisis.
2 posted on
07/13/2019 6:01:50 AM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: usconservative
To: usconservative
The Court remains drunk on power as even its conservative members demonstrate.
To: usconservative
......the beautiful thing in Kagan's language: she just made a clear and cogent case against Stare Decisis....... Nice catch.
24 posted on
07/15/2019 5:23:17 AM PDT by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson