“The question should be about “inhabitants” and the Constitution’s original public meaning which tied apportionment “to persons with a fixed abode and far more permanent place in the political community than simple physical presence.”
I agree in principle, but what if the courts rule otherwise?
What the courts determine is a good question. So far, it has been a crap shoot with gains and losses. I hope Trump strikes gold and halts the Dem’s effort to rig the elections with the illegal migrant vote.