Is anybody in the media going to mention the slaves owned by Cameltoe’s ancestors?
Can we talk about the child slaves owned *today*?
You know, the helpless, innocent children dragged across the Sonoran desert after being purchased from their parents?
They’re then used by illegals to gain entry into the US concentration camps, where they are *not* kept with unrelated adults, making mewling libtards very unhappy. Oh. Wait.
You can’t make libtards happy. It doesn’t matter what you do. Oh, crap. The bernaise sauce at Gitmo was runny again.
And you can tell your mentally ill lib friends (why you have any is a mystery to me) and family (you’re stuck with those) that the policy of separation was approved by Bill Clinton in 1996.
Simple common sense should make it obvious why keeping minor children with unrelated adults, especially unrelated adult criminals, is a really bad idea.
The children *must* be released promptly, and will be accompanied by their buyers. Lunatic judges love to set arbitrary detention periods.
Upon release, many of them are snatched up and trafficked. Some are forced into indentured servitude as maids. The even less fortunate are drugged up, turned into addicts (makes them controllable), and live out their days as sex slaves.
When do we get to talk about *their* reparations, Senator Spartacus, you ass***e?
Kamala Brown’s family owned an entire town of slaves.
“Is anybody in the media going to mention the slaves owned by Cameltoe’s ancestors?”
Sure! Right along with their discussion on how she is an anchor baby and not a natural born citizen. No, it seems America is still reluctant to seriously question any person with a drop of negro blood out of fear of being called racist by some drooling leftist moron. Sack up America!