Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"PEROT SEEN NOT AFFECTING VOTE OUTCOME
By E.J. Dionne Jr. | November 8, 1992

…The analysis, based on exit polls conducted by Voter Research & Surveys (VRS) for the major news organizations, indicated that in Perot's absence, only Ohio would have have shifted from the Clinton column to the Bush column. This would still have left Clinton with a healthy 349-to-189 majority in the electoral college.

And even in Ohio, the hypothetical Bush "margin" without Perot in the race was so small that given the normal margin of error in polls, the state still might have stuck with Clinton absent the Texas billionaire."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1992/11/08/perot-seen-not-affecting-vote-outcome/27500538-cee8-4f4f-8e7f-f3ee9f2325d1/?utm_term=.6790ed3f7675

66 posted on 07/10/2019 7:53:41 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid

Also, there is this:

“The Man Who Supposedly Cost George H. W. Bush the Presidency”

http://www.pollingreport.com/hibbitts1202.htm

This article delves into the pre-election polling, as Perot entered, un-entered, and re-entered the race.


82 posted on 07/10/2019 12:05:41 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The Electoral College is the firewall protecting us from massive blue state vote fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson