A deal that has Acosta holding the bag, and now allows the Democrats the opportunity to turn this into a "Trump Scandal" if Acosta steps down, and a "Trump Scandal" if Acosta does not?
The MSM will eagerly pivot the narrative to what did Trump know about Acosta and what is Trump protecting, instead of what did Epstein do and how many Democrats were involved?
-PJ
Ah yes, Acosta was left holding the bag. And a little inconvenient for Trump no doubt. But Acosta was expendable to them, and is to Trump too. I highly doubt this was exposed purely to get Trump even though there is a concerted effort to try to smear Trump with it (e.g. the Blue Checked Twitterbots and the Wikipedia entry being expunged of all reference to Democrats associated with the convict).
But the blowback from this portends to be massive and I would think nobody really benefits from reopening this case, except Trump. So if this is a conspiracy, it may very well be a rope-a-dope by Trump’s allies.
Also consider this twist:
1) Alan Dershowitz defended the scumbag in the original case
2) Dershowitz ended up being accused
3) In the effort to clear his name he joined in the effort to unseal the records
4) And of course, Dershowitz has been a Trump defender against the conspiracy hoax to take him down.
Perhaps just a coincidence...