“The question is what percentage of all his hires have turned out bad. 25 % is probably about as good as possible. IMHO.”
And just how do you come up with 25%? It seems to me that the Sessions, Tillerson, Wray and the FED Chairman positions, needed a whole lot more vetting. We are talking about KEY PEOPLE here. Collectively, these four people have cost Trump more that half of his first term. And replacing Prebus (who was a terrible choice in the first place) with McMaster ( who was a snake in the grass from the get go who thought he was better than the President), probably contributed to his making other poor choices because at no time, until he fired McMaster and gave his budget director, Mick Mulvaney the job, did he have someone who was loyal to him.
Trump has had a very steep learning curve, and he has NOT had the degree of loyalty he thought he would get, because he’s not a politician (Thank God). I stand amazed at what he has accomplished, and I only wonder just how much better it would have been had he picked loyal people who looked forward to carrying out his programs, instead of trying to f*ck him at every turn in the road!
You are talking about department heads. They dont really do any actual work lol. That gets delegated.