Posted on 07/08/2019 6:03:34 PM PDT by springwater13
Former President Bill Clinton took a romantic jaunt in 2002 to convicted pedophile pal Jeffrey Epsteins orgy island with two young girls from New York, according to a shocking new interview.
Virginia Roberts, whos accused Epstein of turning her into a sex slave at age 17 and forcing her to sleep with his powerful friends, claimed Clinton stayed in one of the many villas on Epsteins US Virgin Islands estate where group sex was a regular occurrence.
I remember asking Jeffrey, Whats Bill Clinton doing here? kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said, Well, he owes me a favor, Roberts told her lawyers in a 2011 interview obtained by RadarOnline.com. He never told me what favors they were.
Bubba was accompanied by two of Epsteins regular girlfriends and two young girls that I could identify, Roberts claimed.
I never really knew them well anyways. It was just two girls from New York, she said. Enlarge Image Virginia RobertsKarl Larsen/Coleman-Rayner
According to flight logs, Clinton flew on Epsteins private Boeing 727, which Roberts said was outfitted with a special bed for kinky, high-altitude romps, the Web site said.
It was a lot of the same things that went down on the ground, she claimed. There would be sexual conduct; there would be foreplay. There was a bed in there, so we could basically re-enact exactly what happened in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off with foreplay. Sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies.
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
Most likely Senator Menendez visited Orgie Island. It’s his MO.
Sometimes I don’t and some times I do.It depends on that the truth is. But either way, I can handle it.
Sometime I get irked for a couple of seconds, then I get over it and life goes on. Other times it don’t bother me.
Have a nice one.
Bubba: I did not have sex on that island, Little St. James.
I stated an opinion of belief.
Unlike you, I didn’t accuse anyone of being “wrong” without backing it up.
Media: “me too” but not you...
LOL!
Blood on their hands, but as long as they make a profit...
Bill knew this was coming and needed to get his ‘message’ out first.
Same as Monica...no one will believe him anymore.
Interesting that the story of these two new accusers from NY comes out on January 24, 2015...I wonder if these two are the ones being represented by GoreWar election 2000 lawyer David Boise
January 2015 was an awfully interesting month, a lot of things going on with Muslim Bro visitors to the white house and Clinton and so on that the Obama admin must have appreciated a sex scandal distraction to draw eyes the other way.
Guess they didn't have a thing for asian chicks.
Here's the official video for all the Epstein threads: Oingo Boingo - Little Girls
Remember the Florida Professor that went over there and brought back a boy?
I read that in Asia the parents would sell their young female children to the White Slavers who in turn would sell them to brothel owners.
Didn't hear about that, but I am not surprised at all.
I wish I had even a smidgen of faith in our legal system. Unfortunately, it has been clear for decades that it operates on two different levels. One for the well connected, and one for the rest of us. The people drooling over Bill Clinton and his pals being in jeopardy over this are delusional.
13-year-olds cannot consent, for any reason, when it comes to these matters. But then if you think that they willingly stepped into such matters with enthusiastic consent, you need to open your eyes and go research what Grooming is and how insidious it is. There are a plethora of reasons why trafficking is such a nasty business and why so many are never found.
Bet there's plenty of men who share your sentiment that a 13-year-old would willingly engage in sexual relations with a 50-year-old man - even if they are paid handsomely for it.
Nothing screams blackmail like, Either do that powerful politician or eat a bullet now.
I'm the one who listens to these girls and how easy it is to lead them astray when they don't have positive support systems, or a mother and a father, are living in poverty, and not many choices of leaving their situation. They should be protected yet society expects them to be adults at 13 - so men can have at them - and by logic, the boys too - which is the ultimate goal - and has been for centuries.
Your logic befuddles me in how you are so naieve to how nasty society is towards these girls who are pressured into acting this way - how boys have access to hard-core porn before the age of 13 and treat girls like s* and expect them to be those same porn stars for them at 15 - and then are mistreated when things happen and then are, once again, pressured into destroying their lives by killing the child born of such things. All of the blame falls on the girl and yet there are zero consequences for the guys - yet y'all are the first ones to scream bloody murder if your money is at stake.
Are there girls who gladly engage in such things? Sure. Most don't and you're blind and a fool to think that every single girl under the age of 18 willingly choose to do such things.
Oh, right, you're probably of the mindset too that any girl who says it's rape is lying - because of the few who are nutz and press fraudulent charges. For every 1 nut there are hundreds who aren't yet aren't taken seriously, even by their parents, because she's only doing it for attention. Sound familiar?
All because it grows from the lack of understanding consequences at those early ages when these girls are easily manipulated into doing things they don't need to act upon.
Kids should be protected - yet the liberals want at those kids at age 13 and lower and you are in agreement with it instead of fighting it. I'm done with your stupidity.
We are good!
We are good!
Hi.
When do you think Epstein will commit “suicide?”
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.