Posted on 07/08/2019 4:02:12 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Bill Clinton "knows nothing" about the "terrible crimes" linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the former president's spokesman said Monday, in Clinton's first statement after new sex-trafficking charges were lobbed against the wealthy financier.
"In 2002 and 2003, President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane: one to Europe, one to Asia, and two to Africa, which included stops in connection with the work of the Clinton Foundation," the statement said. "Staff, supporters of the foundation, and his Secret Service detail traveled on every leg of every trip. He had one meeting with Epstein in his Harlem office in 2002, and around the same time made one brief visit to Epstein’s New York apartment with a staff member and his security detail. He’s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and he has never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.”
Court documents obtained by Fox News in 2016 showed that Clinton took at least 26 trips flying aboard Epstein's private jet, known as the "Lolita Express," and apparently ditched his Secret Service detail on some of the excursions. Separetely, claims in court showed that President Trump may have flown on the jet at least once, as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Ok, big deal. Clinton discloses his 2002 and 2003 travel itinerary with Epstein, indicating they were all business trips. Additionally, he claims they have not spoken in ten years which means their last contact would have been in 2009. Epstein was “charged” in 2008, which would have forced Clinton to end the connection. So, that leaves us with FIVE YEARS, between 2003 and 2008 that Clinton maintained contact with Epstein.
LOL!
That’s the first thing I thought when I saw the title of this thread.
Sgt. Schultz saying, “I know nothing! Nothing!”
Plus they have knowledge that could probably either protect or condemn many.
Which reminds me, didn’t Obama write an EO, right before he left, that kept a bunch of stuff out of HIS future library?
I don’t believe him...but if you’re molesting kids its not something you’d tell everyone you know (even your friends)
Unless they were perverts, too. Now what is the likelihood of that, I wonder?
Slick Willy says “I did not have sex with any of the underaged sex slaves on Mr. Epstein’s island ...... the 26 times I visited there.”
Previously they’d occasionally say something halfway true. Now it’s literally every word.
From the Guardian 10 Jan 2015:
{Prince}Andrew reportedly met Epstein in the 1990s after being introduced by Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of the the media mogul Robert Maxwell. At the time, Ghislaine Maxwell was the financier’s girlfriend.
The friendship returned to haunt Andrew this week courtesy of one the dozens of women the FBI identified as one Epstein’s potential victims: Virginia Roberts. Like many of the other teenagers, Roberts sued Epstein; the civil claim she lodged in a Florida court six years ago told a familiar story of exploitation.
Roberts was working for $9 an hour as a changing room assistant at Trump’s Mar-A-Lago beach club, where her father was a maintenance manager, when she claims she was recruited to work as a masseuse for Epstein. She claims the invitation came courtesy of Maxwell. It was 1998, and Roberts was 15 years old.
Her civil suit, in which Roberts is referred to as Jane Doe 102, alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell, now 53, and Epstein quickly began grooming her for sex. Despite being told by Epstein, on the cusp of her 16th birthday, that “he would soon have to trade her in because she was getting too old”, Roberts alleged she was thrust into a life of sexual servitude that lasted until 2002, when she fled to Thailand aged 19.
But in one important way Roberts’ allegations differ from those of many of the other Florida teenage girls who say they were victims of Epstein. Her lawsuit states that she was co-opted into Epstein’s inner-circle, flown by private jet to his ranch in New Mexico, his Caribbean island, and his 51,000-square-foot mansion in New York, reputedly the largest residence in Manhattan.
During the four years she claimed to have been a fixture in Epstein’s hedonistic world, she claimed she saw Epstein and his close associates abuse women from across the world, including three French 12-year-olds who she alleged were sent to him as a birthday present. That lawsuit did not identify any alleged perpetrators other than Maxwell and Epstein.
But Roberts’ lawsuit did imply there was more to her story. One elliptical reference alleged that Epstein “required” her to be sexually exploited by “politicians, academicians, businessmen”. These men were described in the document as Epstein’s “adult male peers, including royalty”. Epstein and Roberts settled the lawsuit out of court, with Epstein paying Roberts – just as he paid a series of other girls who were suing him – an undisclosed sum in compensation.
“To: TigerClaws
I understand photo=shopping is not that hard.”
Deep swamp planting TRUMP photos at Epstein home on FBI INSURANCE POLICY plan coup d’état
It’s the victims I have the most concern for.
More like, I did not have sex with that child. Disgusting perverts.
The girls themselves are incidental. That’s why they can be bought off, while the leverage they produced remains.
I always thought Billy Jeff would be found dead in some bimbo’s bed by his SS detail, and then, they would have to dump his body somewhere, clean up the mess and sanitize the situation. Might still happen................
So he is saying the Clinton Foundation was involved with pedophilia. Perhaps some people gave more than just money ?
Jail Him!
The majority of the times Clinton flew to Orgy Island girls under 18 were on the plane.
What did Clinton think the girls were for? Young relatives? Gimme a break... Clinton knew and the press doens’t give a damn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.