[semimojo]

In other words the law does not mandate any prohibition on any demographic related question, and why any administration includes or excludes a demographic question changes not their ability to do so; but we here at the temple of law don’t like this administration, so even though what they did was legal, we will make trouble for them.

Almost. The fact is there's a law, the Administrative Procedures Act, that says even though an agency may have a right to do something the decision to do so can't be arbitrary and capricious. In other words, they have to state a good reason for making the decision.

The problem here is that Wilbur Ross and Commerce botched the justification to the point that the majority of the justices had to say it was just a pretext.

Commerce gets a do-over but they have to come up with a better justification.

[Crazieman]

The do-over will get delayed until the forms get mailed out. Everyone knows it.

[be-baw]

“Almost. The fact is there’s a law, the Administrative Procedures Act, that says even though an agency may have a right to do something the decision to do so can’t be arbitrary and capricious. In other words, they have to state a good reason for making the decision.”

Thanks. I knew there was something that requires an agency’s justification but did not what it was. Now I do.

[circlecity]

"Commerce gets a do-over but they have to come up with a better justification."

They also identified which reasons would pass constitutional muster - basically told them how to rewrite it. It will be back for good.

[fwdude]

There’s not a good reason, on many levels, to know if someone in our country is a citizen or not?