WTBleep?! Who/what decides a good reason?!
Bottom line: If it’s NOT on there, conservatives in blue states should refuse to fill it out.
“but on the other hand it says that it shares “the District Court’s conviction that the decision to reinstate a citizenship question cannot be adequately explained in terms of DOJ’s request for improved citizenship data to better enforce the” Voting Rights Act. “In these unusual circumstances,” the court says, “the District Court was warranted in remanding to the agency, and we affirm that disposition.””
What? The DOJ wanted to be able to compare the number of votes with the number of voters. How is that unusual?
This is so tortured.
>WTBleep?! Who/what decides a good reason?!
Are you daft? The same branch that illegally, w/ ZERO push-back mind you, opined itself to be THE ‘final word’ on the Constitution. DUH!