Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGurl24
Agreed. It looks like Commerce needs to add to it's explanation on why the question is needed and get approval from the court. And the question will be on the Census form.

People are assuming that the court will simply reject it again, but the SCOTUS has just shot down all the reasons that the court rejected the question the first time.

I can't image that the Dept of Commerce is not ready for this.
86 posted on 06/27/2019 8:05:09 AM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: MMaschin
Yep, and the majority made clear to the lower courts:

“Relatedly, a court may not set aside an agency’s policymaking decision solely because it might have been influenced by political considerations or prompted by an Administration’s priorities.”

The opinion sets the framework for the lower court review.

Roberts made this way more complicated than it needed to be, with his cowardly fence straddling, but the end result is that the agency can do this if it really wants to.

91 posted on 06/27/2019 8:06:55 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson