Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGurl24

I thought another article said they ruled against it, because they did not give adequate justification.

U.S. Supreme Court blocks Trump’s census citizenship question, for now

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-census/supreme-court-to-issue-major-census-electoral-map-decisions-idUSKCN1TS1BL

The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant defeat on Thursday, ruling that his administration did not give an adequate explanation for its plan to include a contentious citizenship question on the 2020 census and preventing its addition to the decennial survey for now.


119 posted on 06/27/2019 8:21:30 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Notice how all of the outlets are now adding the “for now” to their initial reporting.

That “for now” is temporary.

The agency simply gives a clearer explanation, and the forms are printed in October rather than July.


125 posted on 06/27/2019 8:22:51 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson