Replies

Do you think that liberals should be able to come on FR and promote abortion or homosexual marriage?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, this forum has had nothing to sharpen its claws on for decades.

You are on a conservative forum. That does not mean that everyone will agree, but it does mean that the owner of the forum has the right to exclude non-conservative advocacy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Again, not your forum and the owner has made it quite clear, YOU don’t speak for him, soooooooooo I’D take his name out of your mouth.

Don’t misinterpret what I said. I never told anyone they are going to Hell. I warned people what leads to Hell.

Maybe you would be more at home teaming up with the liberals who kicked Israel Folau off of the Australian rugby team for posting this Instagram: “Warning drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, idolaters, Hell awaits you. Repent! Only Jesus saves.”

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3759949/posts

The consensus around here and among conservatives is that he was exercising his free speech. However, apparently you think such posts do not even belong on FR.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You also don’t speak for me, so put away your crystal balls and guessing where I may or may not be comfortable.

Here is what the Bible says about your comments:

John 7:7
The world... hates Me [i.e. Jesus] because I testify of it that its works are evil.

Luke 6:22
Blessed are you when men hate you,
And when they exclude you,
And revile you, and cast out your name as evil,
For the Son of Man’s sake.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Odd, it neither addressed me, nor was I addressing Christ. Or are you comparing yourself TO Christ and trying to take that mantle from Him?

Members of this forum should not be advocating abortion, homosexuality, adultery, pornography, prostitution, atheism, or other ideologies that are contradictory the motto and mission statement, as determined by the judgment of the forum’s owner. If he deems these acceptable or decides to change the mission statement, that is his prerogative alone. However, I am not trying to make any rules, just pointing out these things are inconsistent with the purpose of this site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OR trains, or Cruz supporters, or grouchy old men, or people with an odd point of view on how things MIGHT work. First they came for the Jews, but I wasn’t one……

If you disagree, perhaps it is you who are in the wrong place.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ahhhh, once again, its the “If you don’t agree with ME, then you don’t belong here.

It says volumes about the person making the comments to which I am replying, that when warning people of Hell he gets his feathers all ruffled…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not at all, other than the fact is that your argument has been tried MANY times here and eventually been shown little support. Keep tilting at those windmills.

These are the same to options afforded to every one of us. We can chose to remain in our sins, unrepentant…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Born again is born again

And whether you find my way of talking about these things offensive or not, do you really want to stake your eternity on whether you like my personality?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I haven’t even begun to consider your personality. If you want me to, I can.

Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye;
and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

Matthew 7:5

Jim,

Sorry to bother you with this, but some people on this forum keep accusing me of overstepping my bounds and claiming to speak for you which I have not. I have only pointed out the motto and policies that are clearly displayed on the home page and under the “reply” button.

If I am understanding his response, this guy, Enigo54, thinks this forum should be open to liberals to be able to argue in favor of abortion and homosexual marriage.

Without speaking for you I’m feeling pretty confident based on reading many of your posts over the years that you have no intention of opening up this forum for liberals to argue their beliefs. I am under the impression that this would not be at all in keeping with the purpose of this site.

Thanks again for all you do.