It is a private comapny and they can remove whatever they like... but they can’t LIBEL and SLANDER them on the way out the door.
If they deleted them and said “We don’t want conservatives on here” I would at least respect that.
But NOTHING in Vertas’ video is deceptive, hateful, or defamatory.
Prove that it is- TAKE THEM TO COURT veritas!!!!
I no longer believe that for the case in which a company controls mass communications. I think communications needs to be regarded as a special case where private property cannot be used as a backdoor method for censoring significant amounts of public speech.
I think we need a special exception to "private property" when it deals with carrying public communications. Would we have ever allowed AT&T to censor people on the basis of their speech?
Same thing with internet communications.
Prove that it is- TAKE THEM TO COURT veritas!!!!
They may not be able to do that. A lot of these end user license agreements are basically legal contracts that says the company can do whatever the f*** it wants, and if you don't like it, too bad for you!
Big companies,banks,other institutions are set up so that the worst they ever get is a fine,even in the millions it wont slow them down.We need to figure out how to buy them out.