Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disgusting: Slimy Democrats Were Taking Photos of Hope Hicks During Her Testimony
Townhall.com ^ | June 24, 2019 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 06/24/2019 1:33:04 PM PDT by jazusamo

Disgusting: Slimy Democrats Were Taking Photos of Hope Hicks During Her Testimony

Democrats on Capitol Hill want Americans to believe they're super serious about conducting oversight of the Trump administration, but their behavior last week again proves the opposite. They are unprofessional and unserious hacks out to attack President Trump and anyone who dares to work for him.

Former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks testified behind closed doors in front of the House Judiciary Committee last week. She flew in from California with a team of lawyers to do so after already cooperating for hours with the Mueller investigation.

During her testimony, Democrats were taking photos of her. It got so uncomfortable, her attorneys had to request Chairman Jerry Nadler ask them to stop. Not surprisingly, Nadler had to be prompted and didn't stop them on his own.

From the transcript:

Mr. Trout [Hicks attorney]: Mr.Chairman, I think there are a number of people taking pictures here, and I just want to say that I think it's making the witness uncomfortable. And I would very much appreciate it as a courtesy, if nothing else, if we could--

Chairman Nadler. That's fine. If people will please refrain from taking pictures.

Adding insult to injury Nadler, the guy who issued the subpoena for Hicks to testify, repeatedly called her "Ms. Lewindowski." When repeatedly corrected, Nadler feigned ignorance, pretended not to know her name despite being the lawmaker who forced her to testify and then said he was too distracted to get her name right. That is of course a lie and Nadler repeatedly called her by a different name to shame and embarrass her under oath.

Even CNN, yes, CNN, was appalled.

CNN Panel Slams Nadler & Judiciary Dems For Conduct In Hicks Hearing: “Offensive,” “Unprofessional”

Judiciary Committee Democrats, including Chairman Nadler, aren't professional lawmakers interested in oversight. Instead, they regularly engage in unserious, unethical and shameless abuses of power.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; hopehicks; hopehickstestimony; housejudiciarycom; jabbathenadler; lowlifedemocrats; nadler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Nadless and fellow RATs are genuine slimeballs.
1 posted on 06/24/2019 1:33:04 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hope Hicks is hot.


2 posted on 06/24/2019 1:37:14 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No doubt Nadler was hoping for a syray beaver shot.


3 posted on 06/24/2019 1:39:49 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karnage

This is the greatest!

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/column-2/carpe-donktum-hope-hicks-masterpiece/


4 posted on 06/24/2019 1:41:48 PM PDT by PfromHoGro (Orwell was overly optimistic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: karnage

This is the world we live in, and this is why we can never let anyone take our constitutional rights.


5 posted on 06/24/2019 1:42:38 PM PDT by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nadler is sexist.


6 posted on 06/24/2019 1:43:28 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“...the lawmaker who forced her to testify and then said he was too distracted to get her name right.”

Couldn’t she just have ignored the questions, as they’re clearly directed to someone else.


7 posted on 06/24/2019 1:44:26 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I remember the ollie north hearings,, what was her name ?


8 posted on 06/24/2019 1:45:50 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd ((>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ßuddaßudd

Fawn Hall?


9 posted on 06/24/2019 1:46:20 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ßuddaßudd
I remember the ollie north hearings,, what was her name ?

Fawn?

10 posted on 06/24/2019 1:46:36 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PfromHoGro

That is hilarious. Nadler is roof of one of Rush’s undeniable truths of life, politics is showbiz for ugly people.


11 posted on 06/24/2019 1:48:48 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Getting plenty of pics of her to make a deep fake perhaps?


12 posted on 06/24/2019 1:52:36 PM PDT by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

‘Nadler is sexist.”

A disgusting pig!


13 posted on 06/24/2019 1:54:03 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Worry ends where faith begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

that sounds about right,,


14 posted on 06/24/2019 1:54:31 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd ((>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Sports Illustrated took pictures of her too:


15 posted on 06/24/2019 2:02:43 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

No nads Nadler reminds me of a pile of dirty laundry.


16 posted on 06/24/2019 2:06:16 PM PDT by donozark (There are no flamingos in Venezuela.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

My! She may be the most innocent person we have ever had on here.


17 posted on 06/24/2019 2:06:31 PM PDT by Robwin (very)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So using the wrong name is okay, but heaven forbid you use the wrong pronoun.


18 posted on 06/24/2019 2:07:00 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025
Couldn’t she just have ignored the questions, as they’re clearly directed to someone else.

I was thinking the same thing. Just say "clearly you were expecting someone else, and I don't want to take up their time, so I am leaving." Then get up and leave.

Also, I wonder what the women on that committee felt, did they feel she was being treated respectfully?

19 posted on 06/24/2019 2:07:30 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robwin
I've never cared for those rappers who pull their pants half way down their rear side....


20 posted on 06/24/2019 2:10:37 PM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson