More of this nonsense? Hillary looked the other way at Russian aggression and was Sec of State during every bungling “regime change” scheme which ultimately resulted in Russian troops gaining a toehold in the Middle East and warm water ports for its navy in Syria - for the first time in 40 years since Carter ran the Soviets out of the region with the Camp David accords.
She took Russian money not only for Uranium One, but earlier than that for a scheme in Skolkovo that allowed Russia to conduct widespread industrial espionage on American tech firms that she was induced - by Putin - to invite into their country... most of whom where cajoled into making a contribution to her Foundation.
Then in the 2016 campaign she engineered a scheme of subterfuge, accusing her opponent of being a Russian stooge and of Russia hacking her party’s servers; she campaigned on a war hawk platform of direct confrontation with Russia in instituting a no-fly zone over Syria to shoot down Russian jets - but all of this was probably misdirection from her own culpability wrt DNC leaks, hacks of her personal server, and her fingerprints on $100’s of millions in Russian cash.
The woman who asked the country who they wanted to answer a 3 am phone call didn’t answer the phone when the American Consulate in Benghazi was under attack. We have since, and very recently, learned from FOIA releases that her longtime friends Cody Shearer and Sydney Blumenthal have been rummaging through Libya looking to grab for themselves pieces of Qaddafi’s stolen fortunate - and had been communicating their intentions and clues to the wealth to HRC while she was serving as Sec of State. It’s anyone’s best guess as to what the USA’s true motives were for fomenting revolution in Libya since Qaddafi had already renounced his WMDs and gave restitution to the victims of the Lockerbie bombing. But these revelations might be a clue.
She used the office of SoS as a pay to play scheme; she traveled the world raising billions of dollars from multinational corporations, brutal dictators, theocratic despots and of course from our allies. She corrupted the agencies of government and had them working for her personal political and financial enrichment. She used donations to her charitable foundation as a slush fund to finance to a large coterie of hangers on and loyalists as a sort of ‘government in exile’ while she waited for her turn in the Oval Office. She had no unique vision for this country, she campaigned on no original ideas and indeed she barely campaigned at all other than to attend fundraisers in the homes of America’s 1%.
If the qualification for the office if POTUS is betrayal, subversion, war-mongering, scheming, subterfuge, corruption, abuse of office and massive amounts of financial impropriety then yes she was the most qualified person to have ever run for the office.
You nailed it!