Like I said, Iran had no second thoughts about going after our troops in Iraq and elsewhere; and when it wasn’t them directly, they had their proxies going after our troops and killing them. So, I ask you, are our troops not human targets and/or collateral human victims when Iran goes after them?
So, what the heck is the difference if Iran suffers collateral human damage, especially if they are in the military?
We would NEVER be able to attack Iran in defense of our troops or our equipment and overseas interests, if we can never go after their human assets. They win, we lose, according to YOUR strategy and that of the democrats.
Unfortunately, I cannot make sense of your increasingly frantic replies, and you cannot even remotely understand mine.
Fortunately, I think the situation is well in hand in the Trump administration (who is not a Democrat), and doesn’t really depend on either of our understandings.
Trump’s response has been PERFECT. The reason to use an unmanned drone is to ALLOW for a non-escalating response, and Trump is taking advantage of that, now. America looks like it wants Iran contained and secure international shipping and are making every effort to achieve this with the minimum waste of human life. I believe we even have a President (not a Democrat) who feels this way, himself.
I completely sympathize with your views of Iran’s past transgressions. We have had many Presidents since our embassy were taken as hostages who have done NOTHING to obtain redress.
There’s a new sheriff in town named Trump (not a Democrat), now, though. I’m going to put my money on him to finally deal with Iran.