Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate surprise-billing proposal features payment benchmark
Becker's Hospital Review ^ | June 19, 2019 | Kelly Gooch

Posted on 06/19/2019 4:10:55 PM PDT by buckalfa

Senate health committee leaders have introduced a bipartisan legislative package that protects patients from surprise medical bills by banning out-of-network deductibles in emergencies, establishing a benchmark for health plan-provider payment disputes and ending unexpected air ambulance expenses.

The Lower Health Care Costs Act — formally introduced June 19 by Senate health committee Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and ranking member Patty Murray, D-Wash. — requires that patients only receive emergency healthcare charges that are counted toward their in-network deductible, according to the legislation.

Under the act, insurance companies would reimburse providers based on the local median contracted commercial amount they pay other providers they contracted with and agreed to in that geographic area. The legislation says HHS will be responsible for defining geographic areas and putting a consistent methodology in place for insurance companies to use to determine their median contracted rates.

Insurance companies that don't have adequate internal data in a given geographic area will be able to use the state's all-payer claims database or other appropriate external sources to determine the suitable market median rate, according to the act.

As far as ending surprise air ambulance bills, the legislation would limit patients' out-of-pocket costs for air ambulance transport to the in-network cost-sharing amount.

Mr. Alexander said in a news release that his committee will vote on the legislation June 26.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare; surprisebilling
As one who has taken an unexpected financial hit because of out of network medical fees, part of me sees this legislation as good for the healthcare consumer. Still, I am wary of "bipartisan" government meddling in any market. Then again healthcare has not been a free market since the advent of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965
1 posted on 06/19/2019 4:10:55 PM PDT by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

“in network” fees are those contracted between an insurance co and the doc or facility.

You think contract terms I negotiate with a second party should be binding on you, a third party not involved in the negotiations? What could possibly go wrong?

As usual, Congress loves forcing other people to offer discounted or free labor/services they have no intention of paying for.


2 posted on 06/19/2019 4:54:24 PM PDT by RedElement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

https://www.cassidy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/SMB%20Section%20by%20Section%20NW.pdf


3 posted on 06/19/2019 5:19:22 PM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson