Posted on 06/18/2019 11:56:35 AM PDT by Reagan80
She’s turning out to be a much better Republican than McTurd ever was. And she’s hot.
I think she’s interesting, not at all what I expected and not bullied by the clique. She actually seems to not be beholden. Kind of amazing.
Oh, and one more thing........she was a very vocal presence in Code Pink rallies all over the country.
Can a leopard change it’s spots? Not very easily. She did have her Veteran brother doing ads for her starting several months before the Dem Primary last year. And she had the benefits of Soros dollars slamming McSally 5-1, compared to McSally ads. Those two things, and massive voter fraud, is what assured her win here.
She is better than Flake and a bit of a surprise. Maybe she could switch.
She cray cray. Didn’t expect it to manifest like this, but crazy finds it own way.
LOL.
Easy Bob. Unless you’re female.
Hot compared to Barbara Mikulski, sure.
IIRC, she voted to kill Net Neutrality. That is a plus in my book. She has been a huge proponent for military and veterans affairs. Also a +
She likes to rebel against the systems. Any system. As with Rand Paul. So far, it’s working in our favor. Does Arizona have many Electoral Votes?
That like never happens for our side. I wonder how long that will last? It's nice to see this on the democrats side instead of the usual goose stepping zombies of the left.
What a trusting bunch we have here. She would surely vote to give Schumer the majority which is what matters and no way would I see her being the 50th vote to decide on a judge
She is hiding.
As soon as the RATS have everything in place to take out McSally, she will flip and go full on RAT.
McSally doesn’t even know what Planet she is on.
She’s positively better than Flake or McCain. I’m sure she won’t be available for any crucial votes, but Flake was only once (barely), McCain never, and as a Democrat she’s useless to the media as an anti-Trump foil.
11
AZ, MA, TN and IN have 11 each
So yeah, AZ is pretty significant
Her yes votes are meaningless as the judicial appointments would pass with or without her vote. Thus she is successfully sending the message that she is a "middle-of-the-roader" and "Reaches across the aisle" or whatever term you want to use.
In reality, when the Dems want her vote they will have it.
She is voting not based on how she feels, but based on a desire to get re-elected.
Please, please don't fall for it.
BINGO!
I know she finished a triathlon in less than 13 hours.
that impresses me.
Judicial votes are perhaps the most important thing the Senate is doing.
” I don’t trust Sinema one bit.”
One can never tell. There was the thief on the cross. There was an article in our local newspaper (The News-Gazette, Champaign, Illinois) describing the demise of a local (pardon the expression) Afro-American at the age of 93. She was relatively active on the local political and if my memory serves me correctly, it was always liberal Democrat. The article said that the last few years she was a Republican - it was the party of Lincoln, who had freed the slaves. There are miracles. https://localwiki.org/cu/Anna_Wall_Scott
Please...
She’ll be another Janet Napolitano before it’s all said and done. She was “conservative” at one point too.
She replaced RINO Jeff Flake.
Because of massive immigration, Arizona is a toss up state.
By the time Sinema runs for reelection, Arizona will be solidly Blue, and she will be 100% Democrat.
I don’t think people are under any illusions about how she’ll vote when Schumer needs her. It’s just pretty nice not having to hear about McCain or Flake taking shots at Trump on the fake news circuit only to vote the exact same way as her when we need them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.