Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tom h
But the concessions he got from Ginsburg et. al. were very significant. He got them to agree to narrowing significantly the use of the Commerce Clause for bypassing the 10th Amendment.

Mark me down as skeptical. If you believe leftist judges are going to honor that agreement. that is your right. But O-care itself rode in on a wave of dishonest promises.

63 posted on 06/17/2019 3:23:39 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
I wasn't justifying what Roberts did. Just FYI.

And I'll join the chorus of conservatives who know that Obamacare was the product of deception, distortion, and outright lies.

As for future SCOTUS decisions, well ... you're right, a courtful of Sotomayors or Ginsburgs could not be trusted to adhere to stare decisis when it comes to anything, especially the 2nd Amendment. But then again, who ever said that the fight for freedom isn't a daily battle, never won?

See my other post in this thread. The Obamacare battle is now mostly irrelevant. We now have to fight, equally hard, the battle against Medicare for All. I have no doubt that we would be fighting this new battle regardless of whether Obamacare had passed in the first place, or been overturned.

67 posted on 06/17/2019 4:52:45 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson