Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio’s HB 6 Contradicts Conservative Values
Townhall.com ^ | June 15, 2019 | Sarah Hunt

Posted on 06/15/2019 6:07:52 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Ohio state legislature is considering HB 6, the Ohio Clean Air Program–a poorly named bill that will cost Ohio families money and harm clean energy job growth, all the while failing to improve air quality. 

Most families worry about paying their bills, finding good jobs, and protecting the health of loved ones. HB 6 makes it harder for Ohio families to succeed on all these fronts— it raises electricity bills for Ohio families and businesses, does nothing to abate respiratory illness causing air pollution, and makes it virtually impossible to build new, job-creating clean energy projects in the state.

In reality, HB 6 is nothing more than an old-fashioned government bailout, paid for by the citizens of Ohio. HB 6 subsidizes two aging coal plants, one of which is not even in Ohio, and bails out two nuclear power plants at a $150 million price tag. All of this is done on the backs of Ohio families. Instead of lowering taxes for Ohioans, lawmakers are funding an anti-free market bailout by essentially adding a new tax to residents’ electric bills

The truth is, these power plants can’t compete in today’s energy market. Cheap natural gas is putting pressure on both the coal and nuclear industries. No ratepayer funded bailout will alter this economic fact. Energy bailouts like this HB 6 are a nonsensical answer to the challenge of providing affordable, reliable, clean energy to Ohio families. All they do is punish innocent ratepayers and eliminate competition.

As if industry bailouts alone are not more than Ohio families can afford, the proposed law also guts consumer cost-saving energy efficiency targets. The energy efficiency program has saved $5.1 million on electric bills since it was adopted in 2008. For every dollar invested, the program creates $2.65 in savings. And there are over 112,000 related clean energy jobs in Ohio. HB 6 would halt all this progress in its tracks.

HB 6 effectively makes it impossible to build new wind farms in Ohio, too. One provision allows for a public referendum on wind-energy projects, even after the developer completes the state’s rigorous permitting and approval process. Residents could vote to block a project that has already begun construction. What smart, innovative company will attempt to build new electricity infrastructure in Ohio, only to face a fatal referendum after millions have already been spent on the approval process and construction? This burdensome regulation, coupled with the oppressive, arbitrary wind turbine siting setback law, will eliminate jobs that new wind projects can bring to rural communities.

Conservatives and proponents of free market values should find it concerning that Republican leaders in the statehouse are the driving force behind HB 6. Republicans are supposed to be the party that slashes needless regulation, unshackles the free market, and lowers the tax burden for hard working Americans. Republicans are also the party of personal responsibility and environmental stewardship, exemplified by Theodore Roosevelt’s national park system.

The proposals that constitute Ohio’s HB 6 directly contradict these conservative, free market values. Subsidizing power plants that cannot economically compete is antithetical to the free market. Likewise is adding in new layers of regulation and bureaucracy that intentionally single out an entire industry, wind energy companies, and make it impossible for them to do business. Ohio conservatives in the state house will turn their backs to the Republican history of good economic and environmental stewardship if they pass this measure that hikes energy costs for families while increasing air pollution. Voters will not leave this act unpunished at the ballot box.

HB 6 accomplishes the opposite of what conservatism stands for by disturbing free market forces and complicating the ability of Ohio residents’ access to clean and affordable energy.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: environment; windenergy

1 posted on 06/15/2019 6:07:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If Ms. Hunt were so worried about Ohio families having to pay more for energy, she wouldn't be pushing so hard for wind farms.


2 posted on 06/15/2019 6:15:57 AM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Using those wind farms to kill bats and birds greatly benefits flying insects - flies, mosquitoes etc, and using them to power all the in-service and planned electric vehicles is the last laugh of conventional power plants.


3 posted on 06/15/2019 6:16:06 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ping


4 posted on 06/15/2019 6:17:03 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sounds like Ohio is on the right track! Wind farms are a scourge.


5 posted on 06/15/2019 6:20:15 AM PDT by SolidRedState (I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
I have to question if there are really many birds killed by the windmills as some claim.

My son and I took a trip last fall to Amarillo, Texas to visit my daughter (his sister) and her husband and son. The windmills we saw were in Oklahoma, but we saw a lot more in Texas. I noticed that the blades were turning very slow, and the windmills were quite a distance apart from each other.

6 posted on 06/15/2019 6:37:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wasn’t talking about birds. Wind energy is several times more expensive/kWh than the same energy generated by either fossil fuel-driven or Nuke plants. And although nuke plants have high capital costs due to the cost of disposing of spent fuel, wind and solar have even higher costs /kWh due to materials used in manufacturing and disposing of materials after decommissioning. And then when you figure in the gov’t subsidies for “clean” energy sources, the cost to the consumer really skyrocket.


7 posted on 06/15/2019 6:58:36 AM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
I wonder why everybody talks about energy being generated by either Nuke plants, coals or fossil fuel, but water is never mentioned.

I am a naturalized citizen from Germany and the electricity in my hometown is and has always been made via water, from a creek that flows near the town.

8 posted on 06/15/2019 7:14:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
I wonder why everybody talks about energy being generated by either Nuke plants, coals or fossil fuel, but water is never mentioned.

I am a naturalized citizen from Germany and the electricity in my hometown is and has always been made via water, from a creek that flows near the town.

9 posted on 06/15/2019 7:15:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
I wonder why everybody talks about energy being generated by either Nuke plants, coals or fossil fuel, but water is never mentioned.

I am a naturalized citizen from Germany and the electricity in my hometown is and has always been made via water, from a creek that flows near the town.

10 posted on 06/15/2019 7:15:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"the electricity in my hometown is and has always been made via water, from a creek that flows near the town. ”

Must be a small town if it's getting it's electricity from a "creek"

All snarkiness aside, dams would be an part of going green but dams are a big 'NO-No' in the green movement. So much so that out West they are tearing down small and mid sized dams so trout and salmon can return to those dammed up rivers.

Here in Tennessee, TVA is a term that leaves a bad taste in many old families here. a lot of old farms got gobbles up to build the multiple dams up and down the Tennessee, Cumberland and a few other rivers. People were pushed off and were given pennies on the dollar by the Roosevelt Administration. The Kennedy Administration later did the same thing to create "Land Between The Lakes" nature preserve, which is slowly being sold off to rich investors as vacation homes.

Yeah, dams sound good at first but the costs of buying prime real estate would bankrupt any state or national budget.
11 posted on 06/15/2019 7:56:23 AM PDT by RedMonqey (Welcome to Thunderdome... America 2019)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There are a lot of commercials on radio for and against HB6 (maybe on TV too, but I have a fast forward button on it). The pro side talks about deregulation, jobs and how wonderful HB6, but never says what it actually does. The anti side talks solely about bailing out the "out of state" owner of nuclear plants.

Personally I lean towards against, but that is my default position on laws: good legislation can be passed later, but bad legislation is nealy impossible to repeal later. I hate the pro-side's information free ads which imply good things will happen including kittens becoming fluffier and friendlier.

12 posted on 06/15/2019 8:13:28 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Who's the leader of the club that feeds on dead babies? M-O-L... O-C-H... M-O-U-S-E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Wind Farms self Distruct with in 5 years. Typical Heathen Liberal Engineering and Manufacturing. Also great at Killing Birds.


13 posted on 06/16/2019 5:47:41 AM PDT by carmen2017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carmen2017
Wind Farms self Distruct with in 5 years. Typical Heathen Liberal Engineering and Manufacturing. Also great at Killing Birds.
Don't forget the bats like the people counting the dead birds; the counters only count the birds that fall within the property lines - those out side of the lines, even in plain sight, are not counted.

With the advent of even larger scale wind farms, in a vain attempt to keep up with the electrical power demands of the ever-increasing electric vehicles, and given the increasing dead bird and bat counts, we are safely predicting the world will be taken over by those nasty biting bloodsucking insects.

14 posted on 06/16/2019 6:07:59 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“...HB 6 effectively makes it impossible to build new wind farms in Ohio, too. One provision allows for a public referendum on wind-energy projects, even after the developer completes the state’s rigorous permitting and approval process....”
*****************************************************
Sorry but this review simply demonizes every GOOD thing in this legislative bill (God forbid the actual citizens of Ohio have a say on wind-energy when unelected, unaccountable, permanently entrenched bureaucrats should make the decisions — obviously sarcasm). If you love AOC’s “green new deal” you should oppose this legislation.


15 posted on 06/16/2019 6:21:20 AM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Does shoveling up the dead birds count as a green job?

Are aerosolized dead bats spreading rabies?


16 posted on 06/16/2019 6:23:54 AM PDT by Jim Noble (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

As far as I know the dead are merely counted, and left to lie where the fell. So it may be that shoveling job does not exist. If the bats are aerosolized, be sure to hold your breath as you count the dead, else stay away!


17 posted on 06/16/2019 6:29:39 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Come On Bats.


18 posted on 06/16/2019 7:16:56 AM PDT by carmen2017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: carmen2017

Bats in case you do not know are voracious eaters of mosquitoes, beetles, midges, flying ants, moths, and mayflies - they really relish mosquitoes - so if you like mosquitoes, then yes lets see all those creepy bats dead.


19 posted on 06/16/2019 8:18:49 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson