Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: detective

No members were indifferent to the 9/11 bill, as Stewart dishonestly claimed.


He was chiding the members who couldn’t
be bothered to come to the hearing.


3 posted on 06/13/2019 12:55:42 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sparklite2

“He was chiding the members who couldn’t
be bothered to come to the hearing.”

Read the article.

Only 2 members who were scheduled to be there had other commitments. The bill was about to pass unanimously. There was no opposition.

Stewart was on an attention grabbing rant for the benefit of the media. Everything he said was false.


8 posted on 06/13/2019 1:01:29 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

The members with empty chairs had already agreed to vote for it they had overlapping sub committee meetings to attend this idiot has no idea how things run


33 posted on 06/13/2019 4:29:43 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (nicdip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson