He appears to be suggesting that these will be legitimate votes. No word about fraud, even in the age where people like Stacey Abrams openly admit such fraud—and that is how Democrats make their voters come out of the woodwork as it were, which we saw in 2018. His tone, as I said, appears fearful, which suggests a loss of supernatural faith.
Are you suggesting that the D@mocrats WON'T turn out in greater numbers ("legitimate votes") than in 2016? If so, you're dreaming - after years of anti-Trump propaganda from the media & political establishment, living, breathing D@mocrats (and mindless Americans who haven't voted in years) will turn out in droves.
No word about fraud, even in the age where people like Stacey Abrams openly admit such fraud—and that is how Democrats make their voters come out of the woodwork as it were, which we saw in 2018.
Dead and non-existent D@mocrats vote in every election. It's part of the electoral environment. If Cruz had mentioned voter fraud, the response would have been, "Thanks a boat-load, Captain Obvious!"
When I lived in New Mexico, the D@mocrats would wait for the State totals to come in, and if the election was close enough, they would "find" enough uncounted ballots in Socorro (or some other Party stronghold) to swing the results their way. But fraud only works if an election is close - as Cruz said, it's all about turnout.
His tone, as I said, appears fearful, which suggests a loss of supernatural faith.
If you think it's "fearful" to point out how easily the next election could be lost, if we don't get off our @sses and support our candidates, and actually vote ("turn out"), you're living in fantasy land (or maybe some complacent "supernatural" realm), not the real world...