Allow me to repeat myself:
"Bush II had a chance to address the issue after the 2000 'hanging chad' election, and did nothing.
Please reread that a time or two. (Just as a friendly reminder, the "issue" we were discussing was D@mocrat vote fraud.) If you think my statement 'suggests' in any way that "Gore ought to have won," please get back to me (and start looking for a remedial reading class)...
The way that read to me at first glance, it sounds like Bush won because of the recount debacle rather than otherwise. Sorry if I misunderstood.
Besides, Bush is well known for being quite the RINO, so expecting him to act on fraud is like expecting him to not grow government (which he did in ways that make Democrats seem “centrist” at best). A mention of Bush now begs the question as to a comparison between him and Cruz on this issue I raised.