[NobleFree]

And what exactly did I propose to you?

That social media has a "monopolistic conglomeration of power" and not "private property". The conclusion seems obvious.

I simply started our conversation by pointing out that you are not for small government as you claim.

All you showed is that I am not for NO government - which I never claimed to be.

you think that property gained through Big Government crony capitalism, is private.

No I don't. How did social media allegedly gain property through Big Government crony capitalism?

[FreeReign]

And what exactly did I propose to you?

That social media has a "monopolistic conglomeration of power" and not "private property". The conclusion seems obvious.

Interesting comment.

You've now twisted yourself into a pretzel, making the very point of some of the people that you've been arguing with.

So when Big Crony Capitalist Social Media has a monopolistic conglomeration of power, the "obvious conclusion" is what?