Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

“Enbrel had reached the end of its patent life and its profits were dwindling, meaning it may have made little business sense to invest in the trial, according to the Post. “

this is totally ridiculous: any drug company worth its salt will give its left nut to obtain a new patent for a new use for an old drug that has an expiring patent for an old use ...


14 posted on 06/05/2019 8:40:55 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: catnipman
this is totally ridiculous: any drug company worth its salt will give its left nut to obtain a new patent for a new use for an old drug that has an expiring patent for an old use ...

They are not going to be given a new patent for a new use. That's not how it works.By the time any clinical trial might be completed, the patent for this would have run out, which would mean it would be hard to recover the costs of the clinical trials. This was a reasonable economic decision, but they should have published the results of their analysis of insurance claims.

28 posted on 06/06/2019 6:19:21 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson