After all it 's a woman 's body and only her body without another life to consider. Why not? It's her body, her talents to sell. she has the right to do anything without restrictions.
Or does the "Commerce clause" supersede a 'woman's right?
Just once....
Autonomy ? That baby isn’t part of her - it’s a separate entity. If I water my house plants are they part of me?
Good point.
I’ve often thought about that drug part. It’s my body. But I cannot legally inject heroin into my arm. Society does not permit it, for many good reasons.
And that leads to one inescapable conclusion: Even if you think that a fetus is not a living thing, the pro-choice “it’s my body” argument doesn’t hold water. It is a false argument.
I have heard plenty of feminists calling for legalizing prostitution and their main concern with porn is male exploitation of the women, not the women themselves. As for the drug question it depends if you are a libertarian or not. I don’t know Gillebrand’s personal views but I wouldn’t be surprised if she was in favor of those things.