Skip to comments.I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!.
Posted on 06/02/2019 6:46:30 AM PDT by SMGFan
click here to read article
In the full context, Trump did not say she was nasty. Trump said that declaring that she would move to Canada if Trump got elected was a nasty thing to say. Few would disagree with that position.
“Hillary Clinton perhaps? Im not sure, its a close call.”
At least Hillary has done some work in her life. It may be about the same moral level as Al Capone, but.....
It’s a fine line. He didn’t say “she is nasty”, he said “I didn’t know she was nasty”. It seemed to come out of left field given the conversation. I’d like to know what was said before that video clip.
One of the definitions of nasty is: vicious, spiteful, or ugly.
She has been spiteful and a bit vicious, so...
Good grief, that was uncalled for.
We are a conservative forum that back President Trump but we also are a forum that puts a high priority on getting our facts right and in posting THE TRUTH!
If you feel someone is a “traitor” for making sure we uphold our commitment to the truth, you’re are on the wrong forum or an imbecile....or both.
And they named that sweet new baby Archie.
They should be lambasted just for that.
Insert wink here.
I think what he intended was that what she said was a nasty thing to say and it was.
Perhaps he could have expressed that a tad better but bottom line he should have clarified his meaning rather than deny that he said it considering it was documented and easily verified.
All in all though a spec of dust in the grand scheme of things.
If he is lying, then impeach him! /s
You aren’t posting truth. You are posting your own biased interpretation of what the President is thinking.
Democrats, drive-by-media, al sharpton................................
You’re interpretation of the president’s word have been challenged on a few occasions on this thread and you just don’t get it . . . you are wrong.
Now, if you are wrong because you want to believe that that is what the president said, then I will stick by my previous post.
I heard this and he was entrapped and taken put of context. Media demonstrates they are evil liars.
What “meaning” did he need to clarify? Denying he called her nasty was correct. Only the liberal media (and perhaps you) didn’t understand what he said originally.
It’s obvious if you review my past posting history I am an ardent Trump supporter and have been for years.
Doesn’t mean I won’t point out a mistake, minor though it is, when appropriate.
I didnt know she was nasty” could easily be taken as “calling her nasty” by the average person.
Would have been better to clarify his intended meaning as though it was all a no big deal which it wasn’t.
Much less downside then trying to deny saying something that a fair % of right minded people could interpret either way.
Didn’t hear it, but someone said that he said “her WORDS were nasty.”
Nothing wrong with that!
Exactly. He could have called her a ha'penny skank for all I care.
Is there anything worth less on this planet than the British royals?
Throw in that pufter that likes to sing about them and youv got it covered.
“She wasn’t so nice to you in the campaign...said she would move to Canada if you won...”
What the president should have said....
“She kept her word, and out did herself. She moved much further away...to England.”
Better get mueliar on it right away!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.