Posted on 06/01/2019 7:10:28 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
Where's the evidence, Rob?
On Friday's Morning Joe, director and actor Rob Reiner claimed that there were "piles of evidence of collusion" in the Mueller Report. Yet in the video for Now This that Reiner directed there is not a word about collusion in the Mueller Report. In fact, it focuses solely on obstruction of justice for a crime that the Mueller Report never identified. Liberals pretend that the president somehow cannot fire employees in the Department of Justice.
First let us watch Reiner make his loud proclamation, not backed up by any evidence he provided either on Morning Joe nor in his Now This video, that there are "piles of evidence of collusion."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Reiner is what obsession looks like. Completely unhinged. Divorced from reality. As the Donald continues to prosper, I hope he melts downs to a pool of melting jello, huddled in a back corner of a sanitarium mumbling Russia, Russia, Russia.
Meathead, Meathead
Rolls polly Meathead
Meathead, Meathead
Spews forth crap
Yep!
Once a Meathead, always a Meathead.
Wiki listed mister reiner's 'alma mater' as UCLA; however there is nothing to indicate that he is nothing more than a drop-out.
Fake, fraud, stolen honors...
Nice going, reiner!
.
He’s still a Meathead, dead from the neck up, Meathead.
It is time to remember the John Doe attack in Wisconsin !
What multiple courts found was that the scores of conservatives targeted were merely engaging in their First Amendment rights of political speech and association, just as left-wing organizations were freely permitted to do during Wisconsins bitter political recall season.
What multiple courts, including the Wisconsin Supreme Court, found was that the truly sinister, illegal conduct was perpetrated by non-partisan government agencies, like the former state Government Accountability Board and its hand-picked special prosecutor, and the Democrat-led Milwaukee County District Attorneys office and its abusive prosecutors and investigators.
He used to play a caricature of a liberal meathead. Now he is a caricature of a liberal meathead.
Whoopse, that dern elevator is stuck between floors again.
If the muellar investigation and report were purposely intended to delay or permanently postpone bringing the obama administration staff or clintons to trial for sedition, shouldn’t that be treated as obstruction of justice?
There’s obviously “piles” of bulls**t in Meathead’s brain, or what passes for it.
Every Democrat is a violent totalitarian thug.
I believe he may know something! Perhaps he’s elbow deep in Adam Schiff’s pile of evidence?!
Mueller listed 11 separate potential crimes of obstruction committed by President Trump. The list is in volume 2 of the Mueller Report and deserves to be studied in detail by all Freepers.
But a heads up: There are NO CRIMES DETAILED IN THE LIST OF 11 TRUMP OBSTRUCTION ACTIONS. There are actions that Trump took but none are even close to being criminal.
There is NO CASE that can be made for obstruction of justice based on the report. None. Zero. Zip.
The Dems would have a better case for impeachment if it was based on their dislike of Trumps hair color.
Listening to Meathead is like having a case of the piles.
You have to use your magic decoder ring to see the crimes.
Drink your Ovaltine!
Meatwad, meathead's personal trainer.
“Every time” what?
The seriousness of the charges, the visciousness of the witchhunts.
It’s how the Left rolls.
And lets not forget the abuse heaped in Governor Perry by the drunken DA !
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed all charges in February 2016.[50][9] The court was divided 6-2, and its majority opinion by Presiding Judge Sharon Keller was accompanied by two concurring opinions and two dissents.[50]
The court dismissed the abuse-of-official-capacity charge, and upheld the earlier dismissal of the coercion-of-a-public-servant charge. The former charge was dismissed under the separation of powers provision of the Texas Constitution, a provision which the court interpreted as forbidding prosecution of a governor for his veto, using the abuse-of-official-capacity statute. As to the latter charge, the court agreed with the lower court that it would violate the free speech principles in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution if a governor who threatens a veto is prosecuted using the coercion-of-a-public-servant statute.[50]
The court also addressed the procedural question of whether Perry could make his separation-of-powers argument in a pretrial habeas corpus application, followed by an interlocutory appeal (i.e. an appeal before the end of the lower court proceedings). On this question, the court said: “The nature of the constitutional right at issue entitles him to raise these claims by pretrial habeas corpus.”[50] The previous understanding had been that a defendant seeking pretrial habeas relief had to successfully argue that a statute was facially unconstitutional, rather than unconstitutional as applied (which was Perry’s argument).[50]
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress cannot limit the veto power of the U.S. president, and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals here decided that the same principle applies to the governor. Thus, said the court, the Texas Legislature cannot turn a veto into a crime: “When the only act that is being prosecuted is a veto, then the prosecution itself violates separation of powers,” wrote Judge Keller.[50]
This dismissal ended the abuse-of-power accusations that had detrimentally affected Perry’s unsuccessful campaign for president in 2015.[51] The case also cost Perry more than $2 million in attorney fees.[52]
I’ll take “Left-Wing Retarded Hollywood Turds Who Should Have Croaked Years Ago But Are Still Alive for $800, Alex.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.