[PCPOET7]

Warning Dershowitz is in all probability going to be the lawyer representing hillery in any trial that happens over corruption. if you listen to all his arguments that he has been giving you will find that they contain an argument to be used in defense of hillery if she ever goes to trial. his only reason for saying the house cant indict and the senate cant impeach with out Supream court approval is to try and
appear to be non partisan in his views. If trump ever was impeached he would not let out a peep in defense. My opinion is that in reality Dershowitz would love To see Trump impeached and this is all a pre hillery trial game.

[enumerated]

If you were talking about Lanny Davis, I’d agree 100%

Dershowitz seems to be a deeply principled man who believes the government exists largely to protect citizens’ civil liberties.

Up until recently, he believed Republicans were the primary threat to civil liberties and Democrats were the protectors. He says that what is being done to President Trump is a full out assault on civil liberties and it has caused him to rethink his political loyalties.

He is still an outspoken Leftist when it comes to social welfare, redistribution, etc. he would still side with the Democrats in many issues.

But regarding the threat to civil liberties, I have no reason to doubt his sincerity when siding with President Trump in the last year or so on this Spygate coup attempt.

[masadaman]

Dershowitz telegraphed his position early on when commenting on Fox that campaign activities especially among candidates for the Presidency should not be the basis of criminal proceedings. That followed Comey’s second presser just before the 2016 election. I thought at the time that he was then working for Hillary.

The Dems who pay attention know that any review by Barr will uncover the roots of the coup and Schiff’s demand to see the evidence contemporaneously is clearly an attempt to kill or counter whatever is discovered when it is found.