Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forget the First Amendment: 41% of college students believe hate speech SHOULD NOT be protected
Daily Mail ^ | 31 May 2019 | Valerie Bauman

Posted on 05/31/2019 10:32:43 AM PDT by Heartlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Heartlander

Just wait till they find out thaT spouting anti-semitic and anti-Christians messages is hate speech too- and in their words ‘shouldn’t be protected’- Watch em stammer hemm and hawww then


21 posted on 05/31/2019 11:49:00 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

The entire subject is a useless endeavor until we define what hate speech is; and determine who it is that defines it.

True hate speech of the demagogic type does need to have some limits - but toady’s idiots think anything spoken aloud that disagrees with the leftist, Democrat party’s ideals is hate speech.


22 posted on 05/31/2019 11:50:48 AM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Every prospective employee, shall sit down and watch Blazing Saddles in it’s entirety and discuss their feelings afterwards. Should be easy to weed the weenies out.


23 posted on 05/31/2019 12:03:09 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

until we define what hate speech is;

I’ll take a shot:
speaking Truth to someone that lies about everything or has been fed lies about everything.


24 posted on 05/31/2019 12:04:49 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

The speech some hate is magically presented as hate speech; dissenting intellectual positions become mental conditions; and contrary opinions are delegitimised – after all, there’s no need to argue with a mad man or woman. This is censorship by way of intellectual pathology. - Ben Shapiro


25 posted on 05/31/2019 3:26:38 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
A part of this is that the term is 'hate speech' which sounds super great to outlaw, but 'hate speech' REALLY means 'I disagree with' the current lefty no-no to disagree with.

If they called the dang laws by a non-Orwellian name like 'disagreement-speech' then even the lumpen college kids would do a double take and maybe only 20% of them would be for it.

But one day they will find, disagreeing with someone or something, that they are sued or locked up or fired or fined or shot. And at that moment they will say 'I wasn't hating, I was just disagreeing' and they will have woken up too late.

That said, this is America, and if you're not initiating harmful force against someone, or encouraging people to initiate harmful force, or committing fraud ... then hate, though not recommended, should be as lawful as breathing.

26 posted on 05/31/2019 3:29:27 PM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
Makes you reluctant to turn over the keys to the nation to them, doesn’t it?

At some point they're going to take the keys from us, regardless. It's always been our responsibility to make sure they were worthy enough to handle the country.

27 posted on 06/01/2019 1:05:31 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson