Well, we agree on Nunes but I am curious about
your attitude regarding Gowdy. How is he different
than Nunes? Neither one could unilaterally move
against the Democrats and neither one could complain
about it without risking their status as a chairman.
What did they have on Gowdy that they could blackmail
him with?
Nunes has been getting the story out relentlessly.
Gowdy with, say, Benghazi? Just a for-show diversion and coverup.
And I have no idea what they have on Gowdy or how legit it is. But the default is that they have compromising material on pretty much all these guys. That Nunes (and Meadows and a couple others) speak out now as they do suggests that they are rare in how clean they are.