Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nevada's about to commit political suicide — is the Electoral College doomed?
The Hill ^ | 05/30/19 | Gary L. Gregg

Posted on 05/30/2019 11:33:59 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2019 11:33:59 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The Nev. Governor has vetoed the bill.
2 posted on 05/30/2019 11:35:21 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (If you are not interested you will see nothing but the road you walk on.-Jim Corbett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Vetoed already.


3 posted on 05/30/2019 11:35:21 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (September 11, 2001 : Never forget, never forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Fortunately he vetoed
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3753248/posts


4 posted on 05/30/2019 11:35:41 AM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The federal Voting Rights lawsuit needs to be to disqualify all of these states’ electoral votes from being counted in the total.


5 posted on 05/30/2019 11:35:50 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

If you weren’t so long-winded, you wouldn’t have posted at the same time as post 3.


6 posted on 05/30/2019 11:37:37 AM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Already vetoed.

Fail of an article.


7 posted on 05/30/2019 11:37:58 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’m a strong believer in the Electoral College and what they are doing is really doing us all a disservice.

But I believe Trump will win the popular vote this year and I delight in thinking they will have to support him in the EC.

Serves them right.


8 posted on 05/30/2019 11:37:59 AM PDT by Hang'emAll (If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker
State legislature just virtue signaling here. They probably knew ahead of time the governor would veto but wanted to make a "statement" nonetheless.

If Trump wins the popular vote in 2020, you will hear nary a peep from anybody on this nonsense ever again. Guaranteed.

9 posted on 05/30/2019 11:38:04 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If these popular vote jackasses want the constitutional compact to be broken then, fine, keep on this path. However: Disenfranchising me is going to make me very angry. Very very angry. Very very very angry.


10 posted on 05/30/2019 11:39:25 AM PDT by TalBlack (Damn right I'll "do something" you fat, balding son of a bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

No worries. If enough lib states do this to constitute 270 EV (and lib states are the only ones that want this), then Kentucky, Tennessee, Utah, and so on, can suddenly discover 38 million (R) votes in someone’s trunk each and every election. Fight fire with fire. Libs are stupid, use that to your advantage.


11 posted on 05/30/2019 11:41:55 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
We have to get the truth out, the national popular vote is really only California.

It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California

Sadly media has made it seem unfair, that the majority of Americans didn't win. But if you watch any replay of 2016 election night you'll notice Trump won on national popular right through the end.

12 posted on 05/30/2019 11:42:03 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

What’s to stop other states from refusing to show thier popular vote talleys until after certification?


13 posted on 05/30/2019 11:44:06 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California

.....assuming she actually won the PV.

14 posted on 05/30/2019 11:44:18 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll

“But I believe Trump will win the popular vote this year and I....”

There’s no way in H Trump will win the popular vote this year and you can take that to the bank.


15 posted on 05/30/2019 11:44:33 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The EC is the firewall that protects us from deep blue states like Kalifornia that harbor millions of illegal voters.


16 posted on 05/30/2019 11:45:01 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Trump: "America will never be a socialist country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Or just play the game by lib rules and actually turn this to your advantage. See my 11


17 posted on 05/30/2019 11:45:09 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing
The federal Voting Rights lawsuit needs to be to disqualify all of these states’ electoral votes from being counted in the total.

I think this National Popular Vote initiative is a very bad idea for all the reasons listed. I also think it will be ignored by the 'blue' states the minute a Republican gets a majority of the national popular vote.

However, it does not take a Constitutional amendment to do this. The Constitution establishes that the states get to decide how to apportion their electors, and if they choose to do so on the basis of how other states voted rather than on how their own citizens voted, then they have that authority.

Declaring it to be unConstitutional dilutes the strong arguments on how it will swing all the power in electing Presidents to the big, populous states and smaller states will lose all voice (and candidate interest). I have seen too many threads that get wrapped up in the Constitutionality argument instead of the real issue.

However, it's also a non issue. The deep blue states will go for it, but their electoral votes were always going for the collectivist candidate anyway. The 'swing' states have not been lining up for this, and if the collectivists had control of the additional 75 electoral votes needed to get this measure approved, they wouldn't need it in the first place.
18 posted on 05/30/2019 11:46:32 AM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

You’ve already been disenfranchised, clearly, and have been for quite some time now. Jus’ sayin’. I’m not sure what an outright popular vote would signify, other than more of the same, on steroids, with a double dose of Owsley and a Jimson weed chaser.


19 posted on 05/30/2019 11:47:14 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

Say what?


20 posted on 05/30/2019 11:47:55 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (If you are not interested you will see nothing but the road you walk on.-Jim Corbett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson